Cited by 527Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

A framework for a streamline-based probabilistic index of connectivity (pico) using a structural interpretation of MRI diffusion measurements

Parker, Geoffrey J.M., Haroon, Hamied A., Wheeler‐Kingshott, Claudia A.M.·2003·Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Abstract

Purpose To establish a general methodology for quantifying streamline-based diffusion fiber tracking methods in terms of probability of connection between points and/or regions. Materials and methods The commonly used streamline approach is adapted to exploit the uncertainty in the orientation of the principal direction of diffusion defined for each image voxel. Running the streamline process repeatedly using Monte Carlo methods to exploit this inherent uncertainty generates maps of connection probability. Uncertainty is defined by interpreting the shape of the diffusion orientation profile provided by the diffusion tensor in terms of the underlying microstructure. Results Two candidates for describing the uncertainty in the diffusion tensor are proposed and maps of probability of connection to chosen start points or regions are generated in a number of major tracts. Conclusion The methods presented provide a generic framework for utilizing streamline methods to generate probabilistic maps of connectivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/jmri.10350

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Probabilistic approaches have been used to create the first atlases of large-scale brain connections.

    “Probabilistic approaches have also been used to create the first atlases of large-scale brain connections (Behrens et al., 2003; Hagmann et al., 2003; Parker et al., 2003).”

    From 40 Years of diffusion MRI in the brain: From history to emerging frontiers (2026) · cites this paper as Parker et al., 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parker, G. J. M., Haroon, H. A., & Wheeler‐Kingshott, C. A. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Venue
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-07-21
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
242-254
ISSN
  • 1053-1807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-2586
OpenAlex
W2085297965
Cited by
527
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 49
FWCI
13.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
streamline tracking, diffusion tensor imaging, Monte Carlo simulation, white matter tracts
MeSH terms
Brain, Diffusion, Humans, Monte Carlo Method, Probability, Models, Statistical, Anisotropy, Echo-Planar Imaging, Uncertainty, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review