Cited by 5Muscle activation and electromyography studiesPeripheral Nerve DisordersNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

Human muscle afferent responses to tendon taps. I. Characteristics of the waveform recorded with transcutaneous electrodes

Open access
Murthy, K S, Gildenberg, P L, Seeliger-Petersen, W·1978·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

Responses of muscle afferent nerve fibres to tendon taps of digital muscles in the human can be recorded with surface electrodes attached to the skin over the nerve at the wrist. Using an effectively monopolar recording method, a considerable improvement in signal amplitude is achieved with simultaneous reduction in mechanical artefacts using differential amplification techniques. The characteristics of the afferent waveform (latency and duration) are discussed in relation to the applied stimulus. The contribution to the afferent response from receptors other than in the muscle have been shown to be minimal. Afferent fibres from primary muscle spindle endings are thought to be the major contributors to the afferent waveforms recorded by this technique.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp.41.3.220

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. r La: C= '2'4 Protected by copyright. on August 1, 2023 by guest. http://jnnp.bmj.com/ J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.41.3.220 on 1 March 1978. Downloaded from
  2. Sears, T. A. (1959). Action potentials evoked in digital nerves by stimulation of mechanoreceptors in the human finger. Journal of Physiology, 148, 30-31.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murthy, K. S., Gildenberg, P. L., & Seeliger-Petersen, W.
Affiliations
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1978-03-01
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
220-225
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161983929
Cited by
5
References
19
Citations by year
2017: 1
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Peripheral Nerve Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
muscle spindles, differential amplification
MeSH terms
Adult, Afferent Pathways, Electromyography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Hand, Humans, Male, Median Nerve, Muscles, Neuromuscular Junction, Muscle Spindles, Reflex, Stretch, Refractory Period, Electrophysiological, Ulnar Nerve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review