The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Critically ill polyneuropathy: electrophysiological studies and differentiation from Guillain-Barre syndrome.
Open accessAbstract
A polyneuropathy of varying severity has been observed in association with sepsis and critical illness in 15 patients. Since clinical evaluation is often difficult, electrophysiological studies provided definitive evidence for polyneuropathy. These revealed reductions in the amplitudes of compound muscle and sensory nerve action potentials, the most marked abnormality. Near-nerve recordings confirmed such reductions for sensory fibres. Needle electromyography revealed signs of denervation of limb muscles. Phrenic nerve conduction and needle electromyographic studies of chest wall muscles suggested that the polyneuropathy partially explained difficulties in weaning patients from the ventilator, an early clinical sign. No defect in neuromuscular transmission was demonstrated, despite the use of aminoglycoside antibiotics in some patients. In those who survived the critical illness, clinical and electrophysiological improvement occurred. The 15 critically ill polyneuropathy patients were compared with 16 Guillain-Barré syndrome patients observed during the same period. The analysis showed that the two polyneuropathies are likely to be separate entities that can be distinguished in most instances by the predisposing illness, electrophysiological features and cerebrospinal fluid results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Muscle wasting in disease: molecular mechanisms and promising therapies
Cohen, S., Nathan, J. A., & Goldberg, A. L. (2015) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4467 · Cited by 1,089
Clinical review: intensive care unit acquired weakness
Hermans, G., & Van den Berghe, G. (2015) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0993-7 · Cited by 792
Neuromuscular manifestations of critical illness
Bolton, C. F. (2005) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/mus.20304 · Cited by 411
Self-citationThe Sick and the Weak: Neuropathies/Myopathies in the Critically Ill
Friedrich, O., Reid, M. B., Van den Berghe, G., Vanhorebeek, I., Hermans, G., Rich, M. M., & Larsson, L. (2015) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00028.2014 · Cited by 396
Clinical review: Critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy
Hermans, G., De Jonghe, B., Bruyninckx, F., & Berghe, G. (2008) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc7100 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Bolton, C. F., Laverty, D. A., Brown, J. D., Witt, N. J., Hahn, A. F., & Sibbald, W. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1986-05-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 563-573
- ISSN
- 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067336599
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critically ill polyneuropathy: electrophysiological studies and differentiation from Guillain-Barre syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jnnp.49.5.563
- The paper
- Bolton, C. F., Laverty, D. A., Brown, J. D., Witt, N. J., Hahn, A. F., & Sibbald, W. J. (1986). Critically ill polyneuropathy: electrophysiological studies and differentiation from Guillain-Barre syndrome. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.49.5.563
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.