The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Meta-analysis of corpus callosum size in schizophrenia.
Open accessAbstract
Studies with MRI have shown differences in corpus callosum size between schizophrenic patients and controls. Most have found that the corpus callosum is smaller in schizophrenic patients, but in only a minority was this finding statistically significant, perhaps due to small sample sizes. Therefore a meta-analysis of 11 published studies of corpus callosum morphology in schizophrenia was conducted to ascertain whether there was a significant difference in corpus callosum size between schizophrenic patients and normal controls. These studies combined comprised 313 patients and 281 controls. Measures of corpus callosum midsagittal area, length, and corpus callosum area:brain area ratio were used in the meta-analysis. There was overall a statistically significant reduction in corpus callosum area in schizophrenic patients compared with controls (P < 0.02). Differences between patients and controls in measures of corpus callosum: brain area and corpus callosum length were not statistically significant. Age and corpus callosum area were related in both patients and controls. The influences on the corpus callosum of overall alterations of brain size, sex, handedness, and psychiatric illness in general remains to be determined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Severe psychiatric disturbance and abnormalities of the corpus callosum: Review and case series
David, A. S., Wacharasindhu, A., & Lishman, W. A. (1993) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.56.1.85 · Cited by 115
Self-citation
Cited by
Neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia: A quantitative review of the evidence.
Heinrichs, R. W., & Zakzanis, K. K. (1998) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.12.3.426 · Cited by 2,798
Meta-analysis of regional brain volumes in schizophrenia
Wright, I. C., Rabe-Hesketh, S., Woodruff, P. W. R., David, A. S., Murray, R. M., & Bullmore, E. T. (2000) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.157.1.16 · Cited by 1,662
Self-citationFriston, K. J. (1998) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/s0920-9964(97)00140-0 · Cited by 882
Synaptic plasticity and dysconnection in schizophrenia
Stephan, K. E., Baldeweg, T., & Friston, K. J. (2006) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.10.005 · Cited by 841
Nelson, M. D., Saykin, A. J., Flashman, L. A., & Riordan, H. J. (1998) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.55.5.433 · Cited by 759
Metadata
- Authors
- Woodruff, P. W., McManus, I. C., & David, A. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1995-04-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 457-461
- ISSN
- 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2130069892
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Meta-analysis of corpus callosum size in schizophrenia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jnnp.58.4.457
- The paper
- Woodruff, P. W., McManus, I. C., & David, A. S. (1995). Meta-analysis of corpus callosum size in schizophrenia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.58.4.457
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.