The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: a randomised control crossover study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a paging system designed to improve independence in people with memory problems and executive deficits. METHODS: After a successful pilot study, a randomised control trial was conducted involving a crossover design with 143 people aged between 8 and 83 years. All had one or more of the following: memory, planning, attention, or organisation problems. Most had sustained a traumatic head injury or a stroke although a few had developmental learning difficulties or other conditions. The crossover design ensured that some people received a pager after a 2 week baseline whereas others were required to wait for 7 weeks after the baseline before receiving the pager. Participants were assessed at three time periods-namely, at baseline, 7 weeks, and at 14 weeks postbaseline. RESULTS: More than 80% of those who completed the 16 week trial were significantly more successful in carrying out everyday activities (such as self care, self medication, and keeping appointments) when using the pager in comparison with the baseline period. For most of these, significant improvement was maintained when they were monitored 7 weeks after returning the pager. CONCLUSIONS: This particular paging system significantly reduces everyday failures of memory and planning in people with brain injury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Validation of a Caregiver Strain Index
Robinson, B. C. (1983) · Journal of Gerontology · doi:10.1093/geronj/38.3.344 · Cited by 1,426
Behavioural Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome
(2004) · Methodology Of Frontal And Executive Function · doi:10.4324/9780203344187-15 · Cited by 1,149
Self-citation
Cited by
Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research
Maas, A. I. R., Menon, D. K., Adelson, P. D., Andelic, N., Bell, M. J., Belli, A., Bragge, P., Brazinova, A., Büki, A., Chesnut, R. M., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(17)30371-x · Cited by 2,609
Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 2003 through 2008
Cicerone, K. D., Langenbahn, D. M., Braden, C., Malec, J. F., Kalmar, K., Fraas, M., Felicetti, T., Laatsch, L., Harley, J. P., Bergquist, T., et al. (2011) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.11.015 · Cited by 1,599
Evidence-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation: Updated Review of the Literature From 1998 Through 2002
Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Malec, J. F., Langenbahn, D. M., Felicetti, T., Kneipp, S., Ellmo, W., Kalmar, K., Giacino, J. T., Harley, J. P., et al. (2005) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.024 · Cited by 1,140
Miller, E. L., Murray, L., Richards, L., Zorowitz, R. D., Bakas, T., Clark, P., & Billinger, S. A. (2010) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0b013e3181e7512b · Cited by 758
National Clinical Guidelines for Stroke.
Robinson, T. (2001) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/pmj.77.906.286h · Cited by 608
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, B. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-04-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 477-482
- ISSN
- 0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024900319
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: a randomised control crossover study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/jnnp.70.4.477
- The paper
- Wilson, B. A. (2001). Reducing everyday memory and planning problems by means of a paging system: a randomised control crossover study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.70.4.477
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.