Cited by 48Antimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingInfectious Diseases and Tuberculosis

Detection of Staphylococcus aureus by 16S rRNA directed in situ hybridisation in a patient with a brain abscess caused by small colony variants

Open access
Kipp, F·2003·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

A 45 year old man was admitted to hospital with a right sided facial paralysis and three month history of seizures. Computed tomography showed a left temporal mass including both intracerebral and extracerebral structures. Ten years earlier the patient had undergone a neurosurgical intervention in the same anatomical region to treat a subarachnoid haemorrhage. In tissue samples and pus obtained during neurosurgery, Staphylococcus aureus was detected by a 16S rRNA-directed in situ hybridisation technique. Following long term cultivation, small colony variants (SCV) of methicillin resistant S aureus were identified. The patient was treated successfully with a combination of vancomycin and rifampin followed by prolonged treatment with teicoplanin, with no sign of infection on follow up nine months after discharge. This is the first report in which S aureus SCV have been identified as causative organisms in a patient with brain abscess and in which in situ hybridisation has been used to detect S aureus in a clinical specimen containing SCV. Antimicrobial agents such as rifampin which have intracellular activity should be included in treatment of infections caused by S aureus SCV.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp.74.7.1000

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kipp, F.
Affiliations
University of Münster (DE)
Corresponding author
Kipp, F
ORCID
Kipp, F
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2003-07-01
Volume
74
Issue
7
Pages
1000-1002
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081183044
Cited by
48
References
10
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Keywords
Staphylococcus aureus, small colony variants, brain abscess, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, rifampicin, vancomycin, teicoplanin, facial paralysis, seizures, intracranial infection, subarachnoid hemorrhage
MeSH terms
Brain Abscess, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Staphylococcal Infections, Staphylococcus aureus, Methicillin Resistance, In Situ Hybridization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review