Cited by 28Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesCognitive Abilities and Testing

Working memory deficits in multiple sclerosis: A controlled study with auditory P600 correlates

Open access
Sfagos, C·2003·Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recently, the P600 component of event related potentials, a waveform that is conceived to be generated and/or modulated by basal ganglia and cingulate area has been considered an index of the completion of any synchronised operation after target detection, having much in common with working memory operation. Moreover, dysfunction of these brain structures as well as working memory deficits have been implicated in the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the patterns of P600 elicited during a working memory test in multiple sclerosis patients compared with healthy controls. METHODS: Twenty two definite, chronic progressive multiple sclerosis patients, with recent exacerbation of their illness, and 20 normal subjects matched for age, sex, and educational level, were studied with a computerised version of the digit span test of Wechsler batteries. Auditory P600 were measured during the anticipatory period of this test. RESULTS: The patient group, as compared with healthy controls, showed significantly reduced latencies of P600 at left frontal areas and reduced P600 amplitudes at left temporoparietal region. Moreover, memory performance of patients was significantly more impaired when compared with healthy controls. CONCLUSIONS: These findings may indicate that multiple sclerosis is associated with abnormal features of the completion of synchronised operation after target detection, as they are reflected by P600 amplitudes and latencies. Dysfunction of this mechanism may contribute to the identification of basic cognitive processes that could account for the cognitive deficits in multiple sclerosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/jnnp.74.9.1231

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In multiple sclerosis, auditory P600 measures have been examined as correlates of working-memory dysfunction, and later work showed that treatment-related improvement in memory performance was accompanied by altered right frontal and right frontoparietal P600 activity.

    “In multiple sclerosis, auditory P600 measures have been examined as correlates of working-memory dysfunction, and later work showed that treatment-related improvement in memory performance was accompanied by altered right frontal and right frontoparietal P600 activity [182,183].”

    From Electrophysiological Correlates of Cognitive Dysfunction in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD): A Systematic and Mechanistic Review of EEG, ERP, and QEEG Evidence (2026) · cites this paper as [182]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sfagos, Papageorgiou, Kosma, et al www.jnnp.com on July 12, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://jnnp.bmj.com/ J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.74.9.1231 on 21 August 2003. Downloaded from REFERENCES
  2. Miyake A, Shah P. Models of working memory. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sfagos, C.
Affiliations
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Sfagos, C
Venue
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2003-09-01
Volume
74
Issue
9
Pages
1231-1235
ISSN
0022-3050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137649333
Cited by
28
References
43
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace - NTUA (National Technical University of Athens) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, working memory deficits, P600, auditory event-related potentials, digit span, cognitive impairment, basal ganglia, cingulate cortex, target detection
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition Disorders, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Memory Disorders, Mental Processes, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review