Cited by 50Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal ChangesMedical History and InnovationsHistory of Science and Medicine

‘Miscarriage or abortion?’ Understanding the medical language of pregnancy loss in Britain; a historical perspective

Open access
Moscrop, Andrew·2013·Medical Humanities

Abstract

Clinical language applied to early pregnancy loss changed in late twentieth century Britain when doctors consciously began using the term ‘miscarriage’ instead of ‘abortion’ to refer to this subject. Medical professionals at the time and since have claimed this change as an intuitive empathic response to women's experiences. However, a reading of medical journals and textbooks from the era reveals how the change in clinical language reflected legal, technological, professional and social developments. The shift in language is better understood in the context of these historical developments, rather than as the consequence of more empathic medical care for women who experience miscarriage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/medhum-2012-010284

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [27]Everett C Ashurst H Chalmers I Reported management of threatened miscarriage by general practitioners in Wessex. BMJ 1987; 295: 583– 6 3117244 PMC1248752

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moscrop, A.
Corresponding author
Moscrop, Andrew
Venue
Medical Humanities
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-02-21
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
98-104
ISSN
  • 1468-215X (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4265
OpenAlex
W2164250194
Cited by
50
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
21.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Medical Humanities (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (ACF-2007-13-009)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medical History and Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
Keywords
miscarriage, abortion, medical terminology, clinical language, history of medicine, medical ethics, legal history, women's health, empathy in medicine, twentieth-century Britain
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Empathy, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Language, Terminology as Topic, Pregnancy, Women, History, 20th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review