The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline device: the PREMIER study 1 year results
Open accessAbstract
Background: Preliminary clinical studies on the safety and efficacy of the pipeline embolization device (PED) for the treatment of small/medium aneurysms have demonstrated high occlusion rates with low complications. Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the PED for treatment of wide necked small and medium intracranial aneurysms. Methods: PREMIER is a prospective, multicenter, single arm trial. Patients were treated with the PED for unruptured wide necked aneurysms, measuring ≤12 mm along the internal carotid artery or vertebral artery, between July 2014 and November 2015. At 1 year post-procedure, the primary effectiveness endpoint was complete occlusion (Raymond grade 1) without major parent vessel stenosis (≤50%) or retreatment, and the primary safety endpoint was major stroke in the territory supplied by the treated artery or neurologic death. Results: A total of 141 patients were treated with PEDs (mean age 54.6±11.3 years, 87.9% (124/141) women). Mean aneurysm size was 5.0±1.92 mm, and 84.4% (119/141) measured <7 mm. PED placement was successful in 99.3% (140/141) of patients. Mean number of PEDs implanted per patient was 1.1±0.26; a single PED was used in 92.9% (131/141) of patients. At 1 year, 97.9% (138/141) of patients underwent follow-up angiography with 76.8% (106/138) of patients having met the study’s primary effectiveness endpoint. The combined major morbidity and mortality rate was 2.1% (3/140). Conclusions: Treatment of wide necked small/medium aneurysms with the PED results in high rates of complete occlusion without significant parent vessel stenosis and low rates of permanent neurologic complications. Trial registration: NCT02186561.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wiebers, D. O. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13860-3 · Cited by 3,905
Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms — Risk of Rupture and Risks of Surgical Intervention
(1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199812103392401 · Cited by 1,894
Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms: Results from a Multicenter Clinical Trial
Becske, T., Kallmes, D. F., Saatci, I., McDougall, C. G., Szikora, I., Lanzino, G., Moran, C. J., Woo, H. H., Lopes, D. K., Berez, A. L., et al. (2013) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.13120099 · Cited by 1,108
Self-citationEndovascular Treatment of Unruptured Aneurysms
Roy, D., Milot, G., & Raymond, J. (2001) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/hs0901.095600 · Cited by 961
A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis.
Samuels, O. B., Joseph, G., Lynn, M., Smith, H. A., & Chimowitz, M. I. (2000) · PubMed Central · Cited by 951
Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms With Flow Diverters: A Meta-Analysis
Brinjikji, W., Murad, M. H., Lanzino, G., Cloft, H. J., & Kallmes, D. F. (2013) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.112.678151 · Cited by 900
Self-citationThe Pipeline Embolization Device for the Intracranial Treatment of Aneurysms Trial
Nelson, P. K., Lylyk, P., Szikora, I., Wetzel, S. G., Wanke, I., & Fiorella, D. (2011) · American Journal of Neuroradiology · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a2421 · Cited by 843
Self-citationBecske, T., Brinjikji, W., Potts, M. B., Kallmes, D. F., Shapiro, M., Moran, C. J., Levy, E. I., McDougall, C. G., Szikora, I., Lanzino, G., et al. (2017) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1093/neuros/nyw014 · Cited by 447
Self-citationMartínez‐Galdámez, M., Lamin, S. M., Lagios, K., Liebig, T., Ciceri, E. F. M., Chapot, R., Stockx, L., Chavda, S. V., Kabbasch, C., Faragò, G., et al. (2018) · Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery · doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014204 · Cited by 96
Cited by
Sarrami-Foroushani, A., Lassila, T., MacRaild, M., Asquith, J., Roes, K. C. B., Byrne, J. V., & Frangi, A. F. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23998-w · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanel, R. A., Kallmes, D. F., Lopes, D. K., Nelson, P. K., Siddiqui, A., Jabbour, P., Pereira, V. M., Szikora István, I., Zaidat, O. O., Bettegowda, C., Colby, G. P., Mokin, M., Schirmer, C., Hellinger, F. R., Given II, C., Krings, T., Taussky, P., Toth, G., Fraser, J. F., Chen, M., Priest, R., Kan, P., Fiorella, D., Frei, D., Aagaard-Kienitz, B., Diaz, O., Malek, A. M., Cawley, C. M., & Puri, A. S.
- Venue
- Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2019-07-15
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 62-66
- ISSN
- 1759-8478 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-8486
- OpenAlex
- W2956838353
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 18.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline device: the PREMIER study 1 year results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015091
- The paper
- Hanel, R. A., Kallmes, D. F., Lopes, D. K., Nelson, P. K., Siddiqui, A., Jabbour, P., Pereira, V. M., Szikora István, I., Zaidat, O. O., Bettegowda, C., Colby, G. P., Mokin, M., Schirmer, C., Hellinger, F. R., Given II, C., Krings, T., Taussky, P., Toth, G., Fraser, J. F., . . . Puri, A. S. (2020). Prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline device: the PREMIER study 1 year results. Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.