The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prognostic factors for duration of sick leave in patients sick listed with acute low back pain: a systematic review of the literature
Open accessAbstract
Background:The percentages of patients with acute low back pain (LBP) that go on to a chronic state varies between studies from 2% to 34%. In some of these cases low back pain leads to great costs. Aims:To evaluate the evidence for prognostic factors for return to work among workers sick listed with acute LBP. Methods:Systematic literature search with a quality assessment of studies, assessment of levels of evidence for all factors, and pooling of effect sizes. Results:Inclusion of studies in the review was restricted to inception cohort studies of workers with LBP on sick leave for less than six weeks, with the outcome measured in absolute terms, relative terms, survival curve, or duration of sick leave. Of the studies, 18 publications (14 cohorts) fulfilled all inclusion criteria. One low quality study, four moderate quality studies, and nine high quality studies were identified; 79 prognostic factors were studied and grouped in eight categories for which the evidence was assessed. Conclusions:Specific LBP, higher disability levels, older age, female gender, more social dysfunction and more social isolation, heavier work, and receiving higher compensation were identified as predictors for a longer duration of sick leave. A history of LBP, job satisfaction, educational level, marital status, number of dependants, smoking, working more than 8 hour shifts, occupation, and size of industry or company do not influence duration of sick leave due to LBP. Many different constructs were measured to identify psychosocial predictors of long term sick leave, which made it impossible to determine the role of these factors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Another systematic review of cohort studies looking at the duration of sick leave for individuals with low back pain found social isolation to be associated with longer sick leave 45”
From An overview of systematic reviews on the public health consequences of social isolation and loneliness (2017) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“| Other physical health (Barton et al 2015, Steenstra et al 2005) | + | | + |”
From An overview of systematic reviews on the public health consequences of social isolation and loneliness (2017) · cites this paper as Steenstra et al 2005
In the citing paper
“| Other physical health (Barton et al 2015, Steenstra et al 2005) | + | | + |”
From An overview of systematic reviews on the public health consequences of social isolation and loneliness (2017) · cites this paper as Steenstra et al 2005
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Clinical Epidemiology: A Basic Science for Clinical Medicine.
(1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-114-9-825_9 · Cited by 3,497
Pincus, T., Burton, A. K., Vogel, S., & Field, A. P. (2002) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200203010-00017 · Cited by 1,633 · cited 4×
“The review by Pincus et al 8 found distress, depressive mood, and somatisation as psychological predictors for chronicity of LBP in general practice.”
InfluentialThe economic burden of back pain in the UK
Maniadakis, N., & Gray, A. (2000) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00187-6 · Cited by 1,510
Systematic Review of Psychosocial Factors at Work and Private Life as Risk Factors for Back Pain
Hoogendoorn, W. E., van Poppel, M. N. M., Bongers, P. M., Koes, B. W., & Bouter, L. M. (2000) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200008150-00017 · Cited by 922
Self-citationA random‐effects regression model for meta‐analysis
Berkey, C. S., Hoaglin, D. C., Mosteller, F. C., & Colditz, G. A. (1995) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780140406 · Cited by 896
Acute low back pain: systematic review of its prognosis
Pengel, L. H. M., Herbert, R., Maher, C. G., & Refshauge, K. M. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7410.323 · Cited by 874
Developing Optimal Search Strategies for Detecting Clinically Sound Studies in MEDLINE
Haynes, R. B., Wilczynski, N. L., McKibbon, K. A., Walker, C. J., & Sinclair, J. (1994) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/jamia.1994.95153434 · Cited by 762
A cost-of-illness study of back pain in The Netherlands
van Tulder, M. W., Koes, B. W., & Bouter, L. M. (1995) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(94)00272-g · Cited by 760
van Tulder, M. W., Assendelft, W. J., Koes, B. W., & Bouter, L. M. (1997) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199710150-00001 · Cited by 727
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- The Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane Collaboration Handbook (updated September 1997). Oxford: Cochrane Library [database on disk and CD-ROM]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 1997.
- 1996, Bull Hosp Jt Dis, 55, 204
- 1995, Acta Orthop Scand, 66, 1
- 2002, CMAJ, 166, 749
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The global burden of low back pain: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study
Hoy, D. G., MARCH, L. M., Brooks, P., Blyth, F., Woolf, A. D., Bain, C. J., Williams, G. M., Smith, E. U. R., Vos, T., Barendregt, J. J., et al. (2014) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204428 · Cited by 3,194
Chou, R., Qaseem, A., Snow, V., Casey, D., Cross, J. T., Shekelle, P., Owens, D. K., & for the Clinical Efficacy Assessment Subcommittee of the American College of Physicians and the American College of Physicians/American Pain Society Low Back Pain Guidelines Panel* (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00006 · Cited by 2,718
Leigh-Hunt, N., Bagguley, D., Bash, K., Turner, V., Turnbull, S., Valtorta, N., & Caan, W. (2017) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2017.07.035 · Cited by 2,158
The epidemiology of low back pain
Hoy, D., Brooks, P., Blyth, F., & Buchbinder, R. (2010) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1016/j.berh.2010.10.002 · Cited by 2,037
Evidence-based analysis of risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting
Apfel, C. C., Heidrich, F. M., Jukar-Rao, S., Jalota, L., Hornuß, C., Whelan, R., Zhang, K., & Çakmakkaya, Ö. S. (2012) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aes276 · Cited by 863
Metadata
- Authors
- Steenstra, I. A., Verbeek, J. H., Heymans, M. W., & Bongers, P. M.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FI)
- Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Steenstra, I A
- Venue
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2005-11-18
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 851-860
- ISSN
- 0007-1072 (ISSN-L)
- 1351-0711
- 1470-7926
- PMC
- PMC1740930
- OpenAlex
- W2123717004
- Cited by
- 495
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 45
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine
- Funders
- ZonMw
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- acute low back pain, sick leave duration, return to work, prognostic factors, psychosocial risk factors, social isolation, social dysfunction, disability, compensation, work-related musculoskeletal disorders, workers
- MeSH terms
- Acute Disease, Age Factors, Disability Evaluation, Humans, Prognosis, Sex Factors, Social Isolation, Work Schedule Tolerance, Cohort Studies, Low Back Pain, Disease Progression, Sick Leave
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
