The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mortality from multiple sclerosis and exposure to residential and occupational solar radiation: a case-control study based on death certificates
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To explore whether mortality from multiple sclerosis is negatively associated with exposure to sunlight. METHODS: Two case-control studies based on death certificates were conducted for mortality from multiple sclerosis and non-melanoma skin cancer (as a positive control) to examine associations with residential and occupational exposure to sunlight. Cases were all deaths from multiple sclerosis between 1984 and 1995 in 24 states of the United States. Controls, which were age frequency matched to a series of cases, excluded cancer and certain neurological deaths. The effects of occupational exposure to sunlight were assessed among subjects with usual occupations requiring substantial activity, so as to exclude those whose indoor jobs resulted from disabilities subsequent to the onset of the disease. Multiple logistic regression analyses were applied, with adjustment for age, sex, race, and socioeconomic status. RESULTS: Unlike mortality from skin cancer, mortality from multiple sclerosis was negatively associated with residential exposure to sunlight (odds ratio (OR)=0.53 (multiple sclerosis) and OR=1.24 (skin cancer)). Odds ratios for the highest occupational exposure to sunlight were 0.74 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.61 to 0.89) for mortality from multiple sclerosis, compared with 1.21 (1.09 to 1.34) for mortality from non-melanoma skin cancer. The OR was 0.24 for the combined effect of the highest levels of residential and occupational exposure to sunlight on multiple sclerosis, compared with an OR of 1.38 for skin cancer. CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory study, mortality from multiple sclerosis, unlike mortality from skin cancer, was negatively associated with both residential and occupational exposure to sunlight.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels and Risk of Multiple Sclerosis
Munger, K. L., Levin, L. I., Hollis, B. W., Howard, N. S., & Ascherio, A. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.23.2832 · Cited by 1,897
Multiple sclerosis: risk factors, prodromes, and potential causal pathways
Ramagopalan, S. V., Dobson, R., Meier, U. C., & Giovannoni, G. (2010) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70094-6 · Cited by 548
Environmental risk factors in multiple sclerosis aetiology
Marrie, R. A. (2004) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(04)00933-0 · Cited by 359
The genetics of multiple sclerosis: SNPs to pathways to pathogenesis
Oksenberg, J. R., Baranzini, S. E., Sawcer, S., & Hauser, S. L. (2008) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2395 · Cited by 347
Vitamin D as an immune modulator in multiple sclerosis, a review
Smolders, J., Damoiseaux, J., Menheere, P., & Hupperts, R. (2008) · Journal of Neuroimmunology · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroim.2007.11.014 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Freedman, D. M., Dosemeci, M., & Alavanja, M. C. R.
- Venue
- Occupational and Environmental Medicine
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-06-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 418-421
- ISSN
- 0007-1072 (ISSN-L)
- 1351-0711
- 1470-7926
- OpenAlex
- W2127818820
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mortality from multiple sclerosis and exposure to residential and occupational solar radiation: a case-control study based on death certificates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/oem.57.6.418
- The paper
- Freedman, D. M., Dosemeci, M., & Alavanja, M. C. R. (2000). Mortality from multiple sclerosis and exposure to residential and occupational solar radiation: a case-control study based on death certificates. Occupational and Environmental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.57.6.418
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.