Cited by 59Occupational exposure and asthmaIndoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

Prevalence of respiratory symptoms among female flight attendants and teachers

Open access
Whelan, E A, Lawson, C C, Grajewski, B, Petersen, M R, Pinkerton, L E, Ward, E M, Schnorr, T M·2003·Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Potential health effects of the indoor environment in office buildings and aircraft have generated considerable concern in recent years. AIMS: To analyse the prevalence of self reported respiratory symptoms and illnesses in flight attendants (FAs) and schoolteachers. METHODS: Data were collected as part of a study of reproductive health among female FAs. The prevalences of work related eye, nose, and throat symptoms, wheezing, physician diagnosed asthma, chest illness, and cold or flu were calculated and stratified by smoking status in 1824 FAs and 331 schoolteachers. RESULTS: FAs and teachers were significantly more likely to report work related eye (12.4% and 7.4 %, respectively), nose (15.7% and 8.1%), and throat symptoms (7.5% and 5.7%) than were other working women (2.9% eye, 2.7% nose, and 1.3% throat symptoms). FAs were significantly more likely than teachers and referent working women to report chest illness during the prior three years (32.9%, 19.3%, 7.2%, respectively). Both study groups were more likely to report five or more episodes of cold or flu in the past year than were other working women (10.2% of FAs, 8.2% of teachers, 2.3% of referents), and both groups were more likely to report wheezing than other working women (22.8% of FAs, 28.4% of teachers, 16.4% of referents). FAs were significantly less likely than teachers and other working women to report ever having been diagnosed with asthma (8.2%, 13.3%, 11.8%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, FAs and schoolteachers report a higher prevalence of work related upper respiratory symptoms, chest illness, and cold or flu than the general working population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/oem.60.12.929

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies demonstrate significant rates of abnormal pulmonary function in this population, including air trapping, reduced flow at mid-volume, reduced exercise tolerance, and elevated rates of chronic bronchitis and sinusitis.

    “Recent studies (Whelan et al., 2003; Arjomandi et al., 2009, 2012; McNeely et al., 2014) demonstrate significant rates of abnormal pulmonary function in this population: air trapping, reduced flow at mid-volume, reduced exercise tolerance, and significantly elevated rates of chronic bronchitis and sinusitis.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whelan, E. A., Lawson, C. C., Grajewski, B., Petersen, M. R., Pinkerton, L. E., Ward, E. M., & Schnorr, T. M.
Affiliations
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (US)
Corresponding author
Whelan, E A
Venue
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2003-11-21
Volume
60
Issue
12
Pages
929-934
ISSN
  • 0007-1072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1351-0711
  • 1470-7926
OpenAlex
W2126220456
Cited by
59
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • Federal Aviation Administration
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
respiratory symptoms, flight attendants, school teachers, occupational health, aircraft cabin environment, office indoor environment, wheezing, asthma, cold and flu, smoking, women's employment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aerospace Medicine, Aircraft, Environment, Controlled, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Occupational Diseases, Surveys and Questionnaires, Respiratory Sounds, Respiratory Tract Diseases, Schools, Teaching, United States, Prevalence, Air Pollution, Indoor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review