CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mobile phone use and brain tumours in the CERENAT case-control study

Coureau, Gaëlle, Bouvier, Ghislaine, Lebailly, Pierre, Fabbro-Peray, Pascale, Gruber, Anne, Leffondre, Karen, Guillamo, Jean-Sebastien, Loiseau, Hugues, Mathoulin-Pélissier, Simone, Salamon, Roger, Baldi, Isabelle·2014·Occupational and Environmental Medicine
DOI 10.1136/oemed-2013-101754
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Unlabelled The carcinogenic effect of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields in humans remains controversial. However, it has been suggested that they could be involved in the aetiology of some types of brain tumours. Objectives The objective was to analyse the association between mobile phone exposure and primary central nervous system tumours (gliomas and meningiomas) in adults. Methods CERENAT is a multicenter case-control study carried out in four areas in France in 2004-2006. Data about mobile phone use were collected through a detailed questionnaire delivered in a face-to-face manner. Conditional logistic regression for matched sets was used to estimate adjusted ORs and 95% CIs. Results A total of 253 gliomas, 194 meningiomas and 892 matched controls selected from the local electoral rolls were analysed. No association with brain tumours was observed when comparing regular mobile phone users with non-users (OR=1.24; 95% CI 0.86 to 1.77 for gliomas, OR=0.90; 95% CI 0.61 to 1.34 for meningiomas). However, the positive association was statistically significant in the heaviest users when considering life-long cumulative duration (≥896 h, OR=2.89; 95% CI 1.41 to 5.93 for gliomas; OR=2.57; 95% CI 1.02 to 6.44 for meningiomas) and number of calls for gliomas (≥18,360 calls, OR=2.10, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.31). Risks were higher for gliomas, temporal tumours, occupational and urban mobile phone use. Conclusions These additional data support previous findings concerning a possible asso…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/oemed-2013-101754

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Hardell, 1999, Use of cellular telephones and the risk for brain tumours: a case-control study, Int J Oncol, 15, 113
  2. Hardell, 2005, Case-control study on cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for acoustic neuroma or meningioma in patients diagnosed 2000–2003, Neuroepidemiology, 25, 120, 10.1159/000086354 · DOI
  3. Hardell, 2006, Case-control study of the association between the use of cellular and cordless telephones and malignant brain tumors diagnosed during 2000–2003, Environ Res, 100, 232, 10.1016/j.envres.2005.04.006 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Hardell, 2002, Cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for brain tumours, Eur J Cancer Prev, 11, 377, 10.1097/00008469-200208000-00010 · DOI
  5. Hardell, 2013, Case-control study of the association between malignant brain tumours diagnosed between 2007 and 2009 and mobile and cordless phone use, Int J Oncol, 43, 1833, 10.3892/ijo.2013.2111 · DOI
  6. Cardis, 2007, The INTERPHONE study: design, epidemiological methods, and description of the study population, Eur J Epidemiol, 22, 647, 10.1007/s10654-007-9152-z · DOI
  7. Frei, 2011, Use of mobile phones and risk of brain tumours: update of Danish cohort study, Br Med J, 343, D6387, 10.1136/bmj.d6387 · DOI
  8. Benson, 2013, Mobile phone use and risk of brain neoplasms and other cancers: prospective study, Int J Epidemiol, 42, 792, 10.1093/ije/dyt072 · DOI
  9. Ahlbom, 2009, Epidemiologic evidence on mobile phones and tumor risk a review, Epidemiology, 20, 639, 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181b0927d · DOI
  10. Hardell, 2009, Epidemiological evidence for an association between use of wireless phones and tumor diseases, Pathophysiology, 16, 113, 10.1016/j.pathophys.2009.01.003 · DOI
  11. Hardell, 2013, Use of mobile phones and cordless phones is associated with increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma, Pathophysiology, 20, 85, 10.1016/j.pathophys.2012.11.001 · DOI
  12. Hardell, 2007, Long-term use of cellular phones and brain tumours: increased risk associated with use for ≥10 years, Occup Eniron Med, 64, 626, 10.1136/oem.2006.029751 · DOI
  13. Khurana, 2009, Cell phones and brain tumors: a review including the long-term epidemiologic data, Surg Neurol, 72, 205, 10.1016/j.surneu.2009.01.019 · DOI
  14. Repacholi, 2012, Systematic review of wireless phone use and brain cancer and other head tumors, Bioelectromagnetics, 33, 187, 10.1002/bem.20716 · DOI
  15. Interphone, 2010, Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study, Int J Epidemiol, 39, 675, 10.1093/ije/dyq079 · DOI
  16. Baan, 2011, Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, Lancet Oncol, 12, 624, 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70147-4 · DOI
  17. McCarthy, 2005, Consensus conference on cancer registration of brain and central nervous system tumors, Neuro Oncol, 7, 196, 10.1215/S115285170400050X · DOI
  18. Baldi, 2011, Occupational and residential exposure to electromagnetic fields and risk of brain tumors in adults: a case-control study in Gironde, France, Int J Cancer, 129, 1477, 10.1002/ijc.25765 · DOI
  19. Pan Ké Shon, 2004, Déterminants de la non-inscription électorale et quartiers sensibles en France, Population, 59, 147, 10.3917/popu.401.0147 · DOI
  20. Hardell, 2006, Pooled analysis of two case-control studies on the use of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk of benign brain tumours diagnosed during 1997–2003, Int J Oncol, 28, 509
  21. Hardell, 2006, Pooled analysis of two case-control studies on use of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for malignant brain tumours diagnosed in 1997–2003, Int Arch Occup Environ Health, 79, 630, 10.1007/s00420-006-0088-5 · DOI
  22. Inskip, 2001, Cellular-telephone use and brain tumors, N Engl J Med, 344, 79, 10.1056/NEJM200101113440201 · DOI
  23. Muscat, 2000, Handheld cellular telephone use and risk of brain cancer, JAMA, 284, 3001, 10.1001/jama.284.23.3001 · DOI
  24. Hours, 2007, Validation of the tools used to measure consumption in mobile phone INTERPHONE study in France (Fr), Environnement risques et santé, 6, 101
  25. Samkange-Zeeb, 2004, Validation of self-reported cellular phone use, J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol, 14, 245, 10.1038/sj.jea.7500321 · DOI
  26. Vrijheid, 2009, Recall bias in the assessment of exposure to mobile phones, J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 19, 369, 10.1038/jes.2008.27 · DOI
  27. Vrijheid, 2006, Validation of short term recall of mobile phone use for the Interphone study, Occup Environ Med, 63, 237, 10.1136/oem.2004.019281 · DOI
  28. Tokola, 2008, Reducing overestimation in reported mobile phone use associated with epidemiological studies, Bioelectromagnetics, 29, 559, 10.1002/bem.20424 · DOI
  29. Aydin, 2011, Mobile phone use and brain tumors in children and adolescents: a multicenter case-control study, J Natl Cancer Inst, 103, 1264, 10.1093/jnci/djr244 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Parslow, 2003, Recall of past use of mobile phone handsets, Radiat Prot Dosimetry, 106, 233, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006354 · DOI
  31. Vrijheid, 2006, The effects of recall errors and of selection bias in epidemiologic studies of mobile phone use and cancer risk, J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 16, 371, 10.1038/sj.jes.7500509 · DOI
  32. Auvinen, 2002, Brain tumors and salivary gland cancers among cellular telephone users, Epidemiology, 13, 356, 10.1097/00001648-200205000-00018 · DOI
  33. Interphone, 2011, Acoustic neuroma risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case-control study, Cancer Epidemiol, 35, 453, 10.1016/j.canep.2011.05.012 · DOI
  34. Hardell, 2009, Mobile phones, cordless phones and the risk for brain tumours, Int J Oncol, 35, 5, 10.3892/ijo_00000307 · DOI
  35. Hillert, 2006, Call-related factors influencing output power from mobile phones, J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 16, 507, 10.1038/sj.jes.7500485 · DOI
  36. Kelsh, 2011, Measured radiofrequency exposure during various mobile-phone use scenarios, J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol, 21, 343, 10.1038/jes.2010.12 · DOI
  37. Lonn, 2004, Output power levels from mobile phones in different geographical areas; implications for exposure assessment, Occup Environ Med, 61, 769, 10.1136/oem.2003.012567 · DOI
  38. Vrijheid, 2009, Determinants of mobile phone output power in a multinational study: implications for exposure assessment, Occup Environ Med, 66, 664, 10.1136/oem.2008.043380 · DOI
  39. Hardell, 2005, Use of cellular telephones and brain tumour risk in urban and rural areas, Occup Environ Med, 62, 390, 10.1136/oem.2004.017434 · DOI
  40. de Vocht, 2011, Time trends (1998–2007) in brain cancer incidence rates in relation to mobile phone use in England, Bioelectromagnetics, 32, 334, 10.1002/bem.20648 · DOI
  41. Deltour, 2012, Mobile phone use and incidence of glioma in the Nordic countries 1979–2008: consistency check, Epidemiology, 23, 301, 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3182448295 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Deltour, 2009, Time trends in brain tumor incidence rates in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, 1974–2003, J Natl Cancer Inst, 101, 1721, 10.1093/jnci/djp415 · DOI
  43. Inskip, 2010, Brain cancer incidence trends in relation to cellular telephone use in the United States, Neuro Oncol, 12, 1147, 10.1093/neuonc/noq077 · DOI
  44. Little, 2012, Mobile phone use and glioma risk: comparison of epidemiological study results with incidence trends in the United States, BMJ, 344, e1147, 10.1136/bmj.e1147 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Coureau, G., Bouvier, G., Lebailly, P., Fabbro-Peray, P., Gruber, A., Leffondre, K., Guillamo, J.-S., Loiseau, H., Mathoulin-Pélissier, S., Salamon, R., & Baldi, I.
Venue
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-05-09
Volume
71
Issue
7
Pages
514-522
ISSN
  • 1351-0711
  • 1470-7926
DOI
10.1136/oemed-2013-101754
Cited by
159
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review