Cited by 48Workplace Health and Well-beingMedical Practices and RehabilitationMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Predictive value of work-related self-efficacy change on RTW for employees with common mental disorders

Open access
Lagerveld, Suzanne E, Brenninkmeijer, Veerle, Blonk, Roland W B, Twisk, Jos, Schaufeli, Wilmar B·2017·Occupational and Environmental Medicine

Abstract

To improve interventions that aim to promote return to work (RTW) of workers with common mental disorders (CMD), insight into modifiable predictors of RTW is needed. This study tested the predictive value of self-efficacy change for RTW in addition to preintervention levels of self-efficacy. RTW self-efficacy was measured 5 times within 9 months among 168 clients of a mental healthcare organisation who were on sick leave due to CMD. Self-efficacy parameters were modelled with multilevel analyses and added as predictors into a Cox regression analysis. Results showed that both high baseline self-efficacy and self-efficacy increase until full RTW were predictive of a shorter duration until full RTW. Both self-efficacy parameters remained significant predictors of RTW when controlled for several relevant covariates and within subgroups of employees with either high or low preintervention self-efficacy levels. This is the first study that demonstrated the prognostic value of self-efficacy change, over and above the influence of psychological symptoms, for RTW among employees with CMD. By showing that RTW self-efficacy increase predicted a shorter duration until full RTW, this study points to the relevance of enhancing RTW self-efficacy in occupational or mental health interventions for employees with CMD. Efforts to improve self-efficacy appear valuable both for people with relatively low and high baseline self-efficacy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/oemed-2016-104039

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Higher self-efficacy at baseline is associated with shorter duration to RTW, and an increase in self-efficacy during occupational rehabilitation predicts shorter time to RTW.

    “An earlier study by Lagerveld et al. [31] on women on long-term sick leave showed that a higher self-efficacy at baseline was associated with a shorter duration to RTW, and that an increase in self-efficacy during an occupational rehabilitation intervention was a predictor for a shorter time to RTW [31].”

    From Strengthened General Self-Efficacy with Multidisciplinary Vocational Rehabilitation in Women on Long-Term Sick Leave: A Randomised Controlled Trial. (2018) · cites this paper as [31]

    The 'Predictive value of self-efficacy change on RTW' results report that higher baseline self-efficacy and greater increases both predicted faster full return to work. But the Methods (page not specified) describe employees on sick leave due to common mental disorders receiving cognitive-behavioural therapy; only 60% were women, and the copy does not establish that all were on long-term sick leave or in an occupational rehabilitation intervention. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The participants in the present study had been on sick leave for an extremely long time (mean 7.8 years) and may not be fully comparable to other studies.

    “In comparison to the above presented studies whose participants had been on sick leave for a maximum of 1 year [31, 32, 38, 39], the participants in the present study had been on sick leave for an extremely long time (a mean time of 7.8 years) and may therefore not be fully comparable to other studies.”

    From Strengthened General Self-Efficacy with Multidisciplinary Vocational Rehabilitation in Women on Long-Term Sick Leave: A Randomised Controlled Trial. (2018) · cites this paper as [31]

    The citation is attached to the comparison studies’ sick-leave duration, not to the present study’s mean of 7.8 years. The Methods Procedure section says participants were on sick leave and were followed for nine months, but it does not state how long they had been on sick leave before enrollment or establish a one-year maximum (searched for baseline sick-leave duration and a one-year limit). (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lagerveld, S. E., Brenninkmeijer, V., Blonk, R. W. B., Twisk, J., & Schaufeli, W. B.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Lagerveld, Suzanne E
Venue
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-12-22
Volume
74
Issue
5
Pages
381-383
ISSN
  • 0007-1072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1351-0711
  • 1470-7926
OpenAlex
W2563950394
Cited by
48
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4
FWCI
6.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Occupational and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
return to work, common mental disorders, work-related self-efficacy, self-efficacy change, sick leave, prognostic factors
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Sick Leave, Self Efficacy, Multilevel Analysis, Return to Work

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review