The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quality of life of hirsute women
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Hirsutism is recognized to cause profound distress in affected women, due to cosmetic and psychosexual implications. It was evaluated in the present study by methods found to be valid and reliable in psychosomatic research. Fifty women with hirsutism belonging to the spectrum of disorders from idiopathic hirsutism to polycystic ovary syndrome, after complete medical work-up, underwent the same psychometric evaluation as 50 healthy non-hirsute women, matched for sociodemographic variables. Hirsute women had a Ferriman and Gallwey score ranging from 8 to 19. Psychometric evaluation for quality of life was carried out by the following methods: (a) Kellner's Brief Problem List, a 12 item self-rating list of psychosocial problems; (b) Kellner's Symptom Rating Test (SRT), a 46 item self-rating scale that yields a total score of distress as well as six subscales (anxiety, depression, somatic symptoms, anger-hostility, cognitive and psychotic symptoms); and (c) Marks' Social Situations Questionnaire (SSQ), a 30 item self-rating scale concerned with social phobia. Patients with hirsutism displayed significantly higher social fears at the SSQ than controls (P < 0.01). They also showed more anxiety (P < 0.01) and psychotic symptoms (P < 0.01) at the SRT, whereas there were no significant differences in depression, somatization, anger-hostility and cognitive symptoms. These results suggest that the complex management of hirsute women, in addition to pharmacological and/or cosmetic measures, may require specific psychotherapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Italian Validation of the Symptom Rating Test (SRT) and Symptom Questionnaire (SQ) *
Fava, G. A., Kellner, R., Perini, G. I., Fava, M., Michelacci, L., Munari, F., Evangelisti, L. P., Grandi, S., Bernardi, M., & Mastrogiacomo, I. (1983) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674378302800208 · Cited by 118
Self-citation
Cited by
Chren, M.-M., Lasek, R. J., Quinn, L. M., Mostow, E. N., & Zyzanski, S. J. (1996) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12365600 · Cited by 699
Azziz, R., Marin, C., Hoq, L., Badamgarav, E., & Song, P. (2005) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2005-0628 · Cited by 537
Carmina, E., & Lobo, R. A. (1999) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.84.6.5803 · Cited by 528
Escobar-Morreale, H. F., Carmina, E., Dewailly, D., Gambineri, A., Kelestimur, F., Moghetti, P., Pugeat, M., Qiao, J., Wijeyaratne, C. N., Witchel, S. F., et al. (2012) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr042 · Cited by 494
Elsenbruch, S., Hahn, S., Kowalsky, D., Öffner, A. H., Schedlowski, M., Mann, K., & Janssen, O. E. (2003) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2003-030562 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Sonino, N., Fava, G. A., Mani, E., Belluardo, P., & Boscaro, M.
- Venue
- Postgraduate Medical Journal
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1993-03-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 809
- Pages
- 186-189
- ISSN
- 0032-5473 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2116205429
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quality of life of hirsute women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/pgmj.69.809.186
- The paper
- Sonino, N., Fava, G. A., Mani, E., Belluardo, P., & Boscaro, M. (1993). Quality of life of hirsute women. Postgraduate Medical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.69.809.186
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.