Cited by 118Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

Italian Validation of the Symptom Rating Test (SRT) and Symptom Questionnaire (SQ) *

Fava, Giovanni A., Kellner, Robert, Perini, Giulia I., Fava, Maurizio, Michelacci, Laura, Munari, Franca, Evangelisti, Liliana Pasquali, Grandi, Silvana +2 more·1983·The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Two self-rating scales of psychological distress, the Symptom Rating Test (SRT) and the Symptom Questionnaire (SQ), have been validated in translations in Italy. They were administered in several studies to psychiatric patients (neurotics and depressives), matched controls, and patients suffering from various organic illnesses (dermatologic disorders, hypertension, secondary amenorrhea and patients undergoing amniocentesis). The SRT and the SQ sensitively discriminated between psychiatric patients and normals, between different levels of psychological distress in several of the somatic illnesses, and detected significant changes in the psychological status of patients participating in medical procedures such as amniocentesis. The scales were found to be useful in research in psychiatry and psychosomatic medicine. The findings suggest that the Italian translations are valid and sensitive scales of distress and can apparently be used as effectively in research as the original. They are likely to be of value in cross-cultural research in Canada. Both scales may be helpful in the psychological assessment of Italian immigrants in North America and Australia, especially in those whose English is poor.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/070674378302800208

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fava, G. A., Kellner, R., Perini, G. I., Fava, M., Michelacci, L., Munari, F., Evangelisti, L. P., Grandi, S., Bernardi, M., & Mastrogiacomo, I.
Affiliations
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Intern, Istituto di Semeiotica Medica, University of Padua School of Medicine.
  • University of Bologna (IT)
Venue
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1983-03
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
117-123
ISSN
  • 0706-7437 (ISSN-L)
  • 1497-0015
OpenAlex
W2410047583
Cited by
118
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
symptom questionnaire, psychological distress, self-report scale, Italian translation, cross-cultural validation, psychosomatic medicine, psychiatric patients, somatic diseases, amniocentesis, neurosis, depression, Italian immigrants, psychological assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Affective Symptoms, Amniocentesis, Mental Disorders, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Neurotic Disorders, Pregnancy, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychophysiologic Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review