The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patients' problems with new medication for chronic conditions
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess patients' adherence to new medication for a chronic condition (and whether non-adherence was intentional), patients' problems with their medication, and their further information needs. METHODS: A longitudinal survey with data collection at 10 days and 4 weeks was performed on 258 patients recruited from 23 community pharmacies in south east England. Patients were eligible to participate if they were starting a new chronic medication and were either 75 years or older or had one of the following chronic conditions: stroke, coronary heart disease, asthma, diabetes, and rheumatoid arthritis. At each time point a semi-structured telephone interview was conducted and a postal questionnaire was sent. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported adherence, causes of non-adherence, problems with medication, information needs. RESULTS: Sixty seven (30%) of 226 patients still taking their medication at 10 days and 43 of 171 (25%) still taking their medication at 4 weeks were non-adherent. At 10 days 55% of the non-adherence was unintentional and the remainder was intentional; these proportions were similar at 4 weeks. 138 of 208 (66%) participants still taking their new medication at 10 days reported at least one problem with it. 137 of 226 patients (61%) expressed a substantial and sustained need for further information at 10 days and 88 of 171 (51%) at 4 weeks. Several patients who were adherent or reported no problems at 10 days were non-adherent or had problems at 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients newly started on a chronic medication quickly become non-adherent, often intentionally so. Many have problems with their medication and information needs. Patients need more support when starting on new medication for a chronic condition and new services may be required to provide this.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Interventions for helping patients to follow prescriptions for medications
Haynes, R., McDonald, H., Garg, A., & Montague, P. (2002) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000011 · Cited by 911
Barry, C. A., Stevenson, F. A., Britten, N., Barber, N., & Bradley, C. P. (2001) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00351-8 · Cited by 464
Self-citation
Cited by
We need minimally disruptive medicine
May, C., Montori, V. M., & Mair, F. S. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2803 · Cited by 734
Gallacher, K., May, C. R., Montori, V. M., & Mair, F. S. (2011) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.1249 · Cited by 356
Fernandez-Lazaro, C. I., García-González, J. M., Adams, D. P., Fernandez-Lazaro, D., Mielgo-Ayuso, J., Caballero-Garcia, A., Moreno Racionero, F., Córdova, A., & Miron-Canelo, J. A. (2019) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-019-1019-3 · Cited by 321
Current Situation of Medication Adherence in Hypertension
Vrijens, B., Antoniou, S., Burnier, M., de la Sierra, A., & Volpe, M. (2017) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2017.00100 · Cited by 292
Can older people remember medication reminders presented using synthetic speech?
Wolters, M. K., Johnson, C., Campbell, P. E., DePlacido, C. G., & McKinstry, B. (2015) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002820 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Barber, N.
- Venue
- Quality and Safety in Health Care
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2004-06-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 172-175
- ISSN
- 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-3901
- OpenAlex
- W4250052710
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patients' problems with new medication for chronic conditions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/qhc.13.3.172
- The paper
- Barber, N. (2004). Patients' problems with new medication for chronic conditions. Quality and Safety in Health Care. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.13.3.172
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.