Cited by 156Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsHealthcare Quality and ManagementPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

An integrated framework for safety, quality and risk management: an information and incident management system based on a universal patient safety classification

Open access
Runciman, W B, Williamson, J A H, Deakin, A, Benveniste, K A, Bannon, K, Hibbert, P D·2006·Quality in Health Care

Abstract

More needs to be done to improve safety and quality and to manage risks in health care. Existing processes are fragmented and there is no single comprehensive source of information about what goes wrong. An integrated framework for the management of safety, quality and risk is needed, with an information and incident management system based on a universal patient safety classification. The World Alliance for Patient Safety provides a platform for the development of a coherent approach; 43 desirable attributes for such an approach are discussed. An example of an incident management and information system serving a patient safety classification is presented, with a brief account of how and where it is currently used. Any such system is valueless unless it improves safety and quality. Quadruple-loop learning (personal, local, national and international) is proposed with examples of how an exemplar system has been successfully used at the various levels. There is currently an opportunity to “get it right” by international cooperation via the World Health Organization to develop an integrated framework incorporating systems that can accommodate information from all sources, manage and monitor things that go wrong, and allow the worldwide sharing of information and the dissemination of tools for the implementation of strategies which have been shown to work.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/qshc.2005.017467

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing classifications, including AIMS and the ICPS, fall short with respect to computer-related incidents because this source of risk has not been systematically examined.

    “However, existing classifications, including AIMS and the ICPS, 18 fall short with respect to computer-related incidents as this source of risk has yet to be systematically examined.20”
  • The Advanced Incident Management System (AIMS) is an incident reporting system based on 20 years of patient safety research, in use since 1998 in more than 1000 facilities across Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, and the United States.

    “The Advanced Incident Management System (AIMS) 18 is one such incident reporting system, based on 20 years of research in patient safety, and has been in use since 1998 in more than 1000 facilities in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, and the United States.”
  • Identifying the natural categories of safety incidents has been the method used for creating the AIMS classification, which is the starting point for expanding the ICPS.

    “Identifying the natural categories of safety incidents has been the method used for creating the AIMS classification, which is the starting point for expanding the ICPS.18 30”
  • Incident reports provided by healthcare professionals have been shown to be useful in examining the risks and harm caused by healthcare.

    “Incident reports provided by healthcare professionals have been shown to be useful in examining the risks and harm caused by healthcare (eg, falls, medication errors, therapeutic devices, and equipment).18 19”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Office of Safety and Quality in Healthcare. Australian Incident Monitoring System AIMS. SNIPt's Sharing News in Patient Safety 2004;1:1-4. www.health.wa.gov.au/safetyandquality/programs/aims/docs/ SNIPtS_Newsletter.pdf (accessed November 2005).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Runciman, W. B., Williamson, J. A. H., Deakin, A., Benveniste, K. A., Bannon, K., & Hibbert, P. D.
Affiliations
Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Runciman, W B
Venue
Quality in Health Care
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2006-12
Volume
15
Issue
suppl 1
Pages
i82-i90
ISSN
  • 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3901
OpenAlex
W2068569336
Cited by
156
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
patient safety, quality of care, risk management, incident management system, World Alliance for Patient Safety, safety culture, international cooperation, health information systems, learning from adverse events
MeSH terms
Australia, Humans, International Cooperation, Management Information Systems, Medical Informatics, Safety, World Health Organization, Total Quality Management, Safety Management, Systems Integration, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Medical Errors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review