Cited by 201Clinical practice guidelines implementationMental Health and Patient InvolvementHealth Policy Implementation Science

Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives

Open access
Boivin, A., Currie, K., Fervers, B., Gracia, J., James, M., Marshall, C., Sakala, C., Sanger, S. +6 more·2010·BMJ Quality & Safety

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) are important tools for improving patient care. Patient and public involvement is recognised as an essential component of CPG development and implementation. The Guideline International Network Patient and Public Involvement Working Group (G-I-N PUBLIC) aims to support the development, implementation and evaluation of guideline-oriented patient and public involvement programmes (PPIPs). OBJECTIVE: To develop an international practice and research agenda on patient and public involvement in CPG. METHOD: 56 CPG developers, researchers, and patient/public representatives from 14 different countries, were consulted in an international workshop. Recommendations were validated with G-I-N PUBLIC steering committee members. RESULTS: Many CPG organisations have set up PPIPs that use a range of participation, consultation and communication methods. Current PPIPs aim to improve the quality and responsiveness of CPGs to public expectations and needs, or to foster individual healthcare decisions. Some organisations use structured involvement methods, including providing training for patient and public representatives. A number of financial, organisational and sociopolitical barriers limit patient and public involvement. The paucity of process and impact evaluations limits our current understanding of the conditions under which patient and public involvement is most likely to be effective. CONCLUSION: Greater international collaboration and research are needed to strengthen existing knowledge, development and evaluation of patient and public involvement in CPG.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/qshc.2009.034835

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boivin, A., Currie, K., Fervers, B., Gracia, J., James, M., Marshall, C., Sakala, C., Sanger, S., Strid, J., Thomas, V., van der Weijden, T., Grol, R., Burgers, J., & PUBLIC, O. B. O. G.-I.-N.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (AU)
  • Université de Lyon (FR)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (GB)
Corresponding author
Boivin, A.
Venue
BMJ Quality & Safety
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2010-04-27
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
e22-e22
ISSN
  • 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-5415
  • 2044-5423
OpenAlex
W2115710612
Cited by
201
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
15.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
patient and public involvement, guideline development, barriers to participation, international cooperation, patient representatives
MeSH terms
Community Participation, Education, Humans, Patient Participation, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Internationality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review