Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPG) are important tools for improving patient care. Patient and public involvement is recognised as an essential component of CPG development and implementation. The Guideline International Network Patient and Public Involvement Working Group (G-I-N PUBLIC) aims to support the development, implementation and evaluation of guideline-oriented patient and public involvement programmes (PPIPs). OBJECTIVE: To develop an international practice and research agenda on patient and public involvement in CPG. METHOD: 56 CPG developers, researchers, and patient/public representatives from 14 different countries, were consulted in an international workshop. Recommendations were validated with G-I-N PUBLIC steering committee members. RESULTS: Many CPG organisations have set up PPIPs that use a range of participation, consultation and communication methods. Current PPIPs aim to improve the quality and responsiveness of CPGs to public expectations and needs, or to foster individual healthcare decisions. Some organisations use structured involvement methods, including providing training for patient and public representatives. A number of financial, organisational and sociopolitical barriers limit patient and public involvement. The paucity of process and impact evaluations limits our current understanding of the conditions under which patient and public involvement is most likely to be effective. CONCLUSION: Greater international collaboration and research are needed to strengthen existing knowledge, development and evaluation of patient and public involvement in CPG.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Financial, organizational, and sociopolitical barriers can limit PPI, particularly in early stages.
“However, a number of financial, organizational, and sociopolitical barriers can limit PPI (Boivin et al., 2010), particularly in the early stages of a research project.”
From Using Personas in the development of eHealth interventions for chronic pain: A scoping review and narrative synthesis (2023) · cites this paper as Boivin et al., 2010
It may be challenging to involve patients in the development of eHealth interventions, particularly during the early stages.
“However, it may be challenging to involve patients; particularly during the early stages of the process.”
From Using Personas in the development of eHealth interventions for chronic pain: A scoping review and narrative synthesis (2023) · cites this paper as Boivin et al., 2010
Cites
Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies
Grimshaw, J., Thomas, R., MacLennan, G., Fraser, C., Ramsay, C., Vale, L., Whitty, P., Eccles, M., Matowe, L., Shirran, L., et al. (2004) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta8060 · Cited by 3,044 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study
Wilson, P., Mathie, E., Keenan, J., McNeilly, E., Goodman, C., Howe, A., Poland, F., Staniszewska, S., Kendall, S., Munday, D., et al. (2015) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr03380 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Boivin, A., L'Espérance, A., Gauvin, F., Dumez, V., Macaulay, A. C., Lehoux, P., & Abelson, J. (2018) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12804 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Self-citationvan der Weijden, T., Légaré, F., Boivin, A., Burgers, J. S., van Veenendaal, H., Stiggelbout, A. M., Faber, M., & Elwyn, G. (2010) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-10 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Self-citationConsumer involvement in systematic reviews of comparative effectiveness research
Kreis, J., Puhan, M. A., Schünemann, H. J., & Dickersin, K. (2013) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00722.x · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Engaging older adults in healthcare research and planning: a realist synthesis
McNeil, H., Elliott, J., Huson, K., Ashbourne, J., Heckman, G., Walker, J., & Stolee, P. (2016) · Research Involvement and Engagement · doi:10.1186/s40900-016-0022-2 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Consumer involvement in health research: a <scp>UK</scp> scoping and survey
Mathie, E., Wilson, P., Poland, F., McNeilly, E., Howe, A., Staniszewska, S., Cowe, M., Munday, D., & Goodman, C. (2014) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/ijcs.12072 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Bartels, S. L., Taygar, A. S., Johnsson, S. I., Petersson, S., Flink, I., Boersma, K., McCracken, L. M., & Wicksell, R. K. (2023) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2023.100619 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Internet Interventions journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/invent https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2023.100619 Received 9 December 2022; Received in revised form 3 March 2023; Accepted 31 March 2023 Internet Interventions 32 (2023) 100619 public involvement (PPI) is esse…”
BackgroundInfluentialAelbrecht, K., Rimondini, M., Bensing, J., Moretti, F., Willems, S., Mazzi, M., Fletcher, I., & Deveugele, M. (2015) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-014-9569-6 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Ryan, S., Hislop, J., & Ziebland, S. (2017) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.12528 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Boivin, A., Currie, K., Fervers, B., Gracia, J., James, M., Marshall, C., Sakala, C., Sanger, S., Strid, J., Thomas, V., van der Weijden, T., Grol, R., Burgers, J., & PUBLIC, O. B. O. G.-I.-N.
- Affiliations
- Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
- National Health and Medical Research Council (AU)
- Université de Lyon (FR)
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US)
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Boivin, A.
- Venue
- BMJ Quality & Safety
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2010-04-27
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- e22-e22
- ISSN
- 1475-3898 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-5415
- 2044-5423
- OpenAlex
- W2115710612
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 15.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ Quality & Safety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Keywords
- patient and public involvement, guideline development, barriers to participation, international cooperation, patient representatives
- MeSH terms
- Community Participation, Education, Humans, Patient Participation, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Internationality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review