Cited by 22Syphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsHIV, TB, and STIs Epidemiology

Can enhanced screening of men with a history of prior syphilis infection stem the epidemic in men who have sex with men? A mathematical modelling study.

Tuite, Ashleigh R, Shaw, Souradet, Reimer, Joss N, Ross, Craig P, Fisman, David N, Mishra, Sharmistha·2018·Sexually Transmitted Infections

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to determine the transmission impact of using prior syphilis infection to guide a focused syphilis screening intervention among men who have sex with men (MSM). METHODS: We parameterised a deterministic model of syphilis transmission in MSM to reflect the 2011-2015 syphilis outbreak in Winnipeg, Canada. Enhanced screening of 75% of men with prior syphilis every 3 months (A) was compared with distributing equivalent number tests to all MSM (B) or those with the highest partner number (C). We compared early syphilis incidence, diagnoses and prevalence after 10 years, relative to a base case of 30% of MSM screened annually. RESULTS: Strategy A was expected to avert 52% of incident infections, 44% of diagnosed cases and reduce early syphilis prevalence by 89%. Strategy B had the least impact. Strategy C was most effective, averting 59% of incident cases. When screening frequency was semiannual or annual, strategy A was the most effective. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced screening of MSM with prior syphilis may efficiently reduce transmission, especially when identification of high-risk men via self-reported partner numbers or high-frequency screening is difficult to achieve.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/sextrans-2017-053201

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MSM screening coverage needed for eliminating syphilis among a population is substantially reduced from 62% with annual screening to 23% with quarterly screening.

    “Furthermore, MSM screening coverage needed for eliminating syphilis among a population is substantially reduced from 62% with annual screening to 23% with quarterly screening (226,227).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [227]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tuite, A. R., Shaw, S., Reimer, J. N., Ross, C. P., Fisman, D. N., & Mishra, S.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Winnipeg Regional Health Authority (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Mishra, Sharmistha
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2017-07-13
Volume
94
Issue
2
Pages
105-110
ISSN
  • 0007-134X (ISSN-L)
  • 1368-4973
  • 1472-3263
OpenAlex
W2735523205
Cited by
22
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Infections (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (136630_1, 143266_1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › HIV, TB, and STIs Epidemiology
Keywords
syphilis, men who have sex with men, syphilis screening, syphilis transmission, syphilis outbreak, Winnipeg, screening frequency, high-risk men, syphilis prevalence, HIV prevention
MeSH terms
Sexual and Gender Minorities, Adult, Canada, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Models, Theoretical, Risk Factors, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, Syphilis, HIV Infections, Incidence, Prevalence, Homosexuality, Male, Epidemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review