Cited by 70Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsSyphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentHIV, TB, and STIs Epidemiology

Screen more or screen more often? Using mathematical models to inform syphilis control strategies.

Open access
Tuite, Ashleigh R, Fisman, David N, Mishra, Sharmistha·2013·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Syphilis incidence among men who have sex with men (MSM) continues to rise despite attempts to increase screening and treatment uptake. We examined the marginal effect of increased frequency versus increased coverage of screening on syphilis incidence in Toronto, Canada. METHODS: We developed an agent-based, network model of syphilis transmission, representing a core population of 2,000 high-risk MSM. Epidemiological and biological parameters were drawn from regional surveillance data and literature-derived estimates. The pre-intervention period of the model was calibrated using surveillance data to identify 1000 credible simulations per strategy. Evaluated strategies included: annual syphilis screening at baseline coverage, increased screening frequency at baseline coverage, and increased coverage of annual screening. Intervention impact was measured as annual prevalence of detected infectious cases and syphilis incidence per year over 10 years. RESULTS: Of the strategies evaluated, increasing the frequency of syphilis screening to every three months was most effective in reducing reported and incident syphilis infections. Increasing the fraction of individuals tested, without increasing test frequency, resulted a smaller decline in incidence, because reductions in infectious syphilis via treatment were counterbalanced by increased incident syphilis among individuals with prior latent syphilis. For an equivalent number of additional tests performed annually, increased test frequency was consistently more effective than improved coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies that focus on higher frequency of testing in smaller fractions of the population were more effective in reducing syphilis incidence in a simulated MSM population. The findings highlight how treatment-induced loss of immunity can create unexpected results in screening-based control strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-13-606

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a compartmental model applied to different populations in Canada, quarterly syphilis screening averted more than twice the number of syphilis cases, compared with semiannual screening.

    “In a compartmental model applied to different populations in Canada, quarterly syphilis screening averted more than twice the number of syphilis cases, compared with semiannual screening (225).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [225]

    The Results report that three-monthly screening was projected to avert approximately 650 incident cases over 10 years, versus 300 with six-monthly screening—more than twice as many. However, the Background and Methods describe a model of high-risk MSM in Toronto, not a model applied to different populations across Canada. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Lukehart SA Holmes KK Syphilis Sex Transm Dis 2006 2 New York: Oxford University Press 311 330
  2. Burchell AN Moravan V Allen V Bayoumi AM Collins E Gardner S Kaul R Mazzulli T McGee F Millson P Extremely high risk of syphilis co-infection and re-diagnosis among men who have sex with men living with HIV in Ontario 21st Annual Canadian Conference on HIV/AIDS Research 2012 Toronto, Canada

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tuite, A. R., Fisman, D. N., & Mishra, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Mishra, Sharmistha
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2013-06-24
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
606-606
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964216735
Cited by
70
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3
FWCI
6.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Toronto
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (88223_1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › HIV, TB, and STIs Epidemiology
Keywords
syphilis, men who have sex with men, syphilis screening, screening frequency, screening coverage, syphilis incidence, syphilis transmission, latent syphilis
MeSH terms
Canada, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Sexual Partners, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Syphilis, Time Factors, Models, Statistical, Incidence, Homosexuality, Male, Disease Transmission, Infectious, Risk Assessment, Coinfection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review