Cited by 43Reproductive tract infections researchCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchUrinary Tract Infections Management

Incubation period and risk factors support sexual transmission of bacterial vaginosis in women who have sex with women.

Open access
Muzny, Christina Ann, Lensing, Shelly Y, Aaron, Kristal J, Schwebke, Jane R·2019·Sexually Transmitted Infections

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The epidemiology of bacterial vaginosis (BV) favours sexual transmission of BV-associated bacteria. We examined incubation period and risk factors for incident BV (iBV) in a prospective study of women who have sex with women (WSW). METHODS: Using daily self-collected vaginal swabs, WSW with normal vaginal microbiota (no Amsel criteria and a Nugent score of 0-3) were followed for 90 days or until iBV (Nugent score 7-10 on at least 2-3 consecutive days). Daily diaries of sexual activity and menses were completed. Time to iBV was estimated. Accounting for differing lengths of follow-up and age, rates of sexual activities (per 100 person-days (pd)) were compared according to iBV status. The relationship between menses and iBV was also investigated. RESULTS: Of the 36 WSW, the mean age was 30 years (SD 8) and 92% were African American. The probability of iBV at 30 and 60 days was 20% (SD 7%) and 36% (SD 8%), respectively; 14 (39%) developed iBV by 90 days. In WSW with iBV versus those without iBV, the relative rate of any sexual activity prior to iBV was 40% higher (20.4 vs 14.6 per 100 pd; p=0.010), sex with a woman was 38% higher (14.3 vs 10.3 per 100 pd; p=0.038), digital-vaginal sex was 57% higher (14.3 vs 9.1 per 100 pd; p=0.005) and digital-anal sex was 5.6 times higher (2.9 vs 0.5 per 100 pd; p<0.001). iBV was more likely for those WSW with menses in the prior 2 days as compared with those without recent menses (HR 3.4; p=0.029). Sexual activity occurred in 93% WSW at a median of 4 days (95% CI 2 to 6) prior to iBV. CONCLUSION: iBV was common and associated with sexual activity in this cohort of predominantly African American WSW. An incubation period of 4 days is consistent with other bacterial STIs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/sextrans-2018-053824

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evidence continues to support the association of such sexual behaviors as having a new partner, having a partner with BV, having receptive oral sex, and having digital-vaginal and digital-anal sex with incident BV.

    “Evidence continues to support the association of such sexual behaviors as having a new partner, having a partner with BV, having receptive oral sex, and having digital-vaginal and digital-anal sex with incident BV (313,314).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [313]

    The Results report significant associations of digital-vaginal and digital-anal sex with incident BV among women who have sex with women. The Introduction reports an association with a new female partner with a BV history, but its separate finding about a partner with BV concerns prevalent BV. The Discussion reports a dose-response association for receptive oral sex in an earlier study, while noting that other measures did not show it. Thus the source supports much of the sentence, but not every behavior as an unqualified association with incident BV. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]Hillier SL, Marrazzo J, Holmes KK. Bacterial vaginosis In: Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Mardh PA,, editors. Sexually transmitted diseases. 4th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2008 p. 737– 68.
  2. [25]Hook EW, Handsfield HH. Gonococcal infections in the adult In: Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Stamm WE,, editors. Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 4th edition. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2008 p. 627– 46.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muzny, C. A., Lensing, S. Y., Aaron, K. J., & Schwebke, J. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Muzny, Christina Ann
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-03-14
Volume
95
Issue
7
Pages
511-515
ISSN
  • 0007-134X (ISSN-L)
  • 1368-4973
  • 1472-3263
OpenAlex
W2921973735
Cited by
43
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Infections (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K23AI106957)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Urinary Tract Infections Management
Keywords
bacterial vaginosis, women who have sex with women, sexual transmission, incubation period, risk factors, vaginal microbiota, sexual activity, menstrual cycle, African American women, Nugent score, Amsel criteria, vaginal swabs, health disparities
MeSH terms
Sexual and Gender Minorities, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Vaginosis, Bacterial, Disease Transmission, Infectious, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review