Cited by 145Reproductive tract infections researchGut microbiota and healthOral microbiology and periodontitis research

Identification of key bacteria involved in the induction of incident bacterial vaginosis: a prospective study.

Open access
Muzny, Christina A, Blanchard, Eugene, Taylor, Christopher M, Aaron, Kristal J, Talluri, Rajesh, Griswold, Michael E, Redden, David T, Luo, Meng +5 more·2018·The Journal of Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background: The sequence of events preceding incident bacterial vaginosis (iBV) is unclear. Methods: African American women who have sex with women, who had no Amsel criteria and Nugent scores of 0-3, were followed for 90 days to detect iBV (defined as a Nugent score of 7-10 on at least 2-3 consecutive days), using self-collected vaginal swab specimens. For women with iBV (cases) and women maintaining normal vaginal flora (healthy women), 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing targeting V4 was performed. Longitudinal vaginal microbiome data were analyzed. Results: Of 204 women screened, 42 enrolled; of these, 45% developed iBV. Sequencing was performed on 448 specimens from 14 cases and 8 healthy women. Among healthy women, Lactobacillus crispatus dominated the vaginal microbiota in 75%. In contrast, prior to iBV, the vaginal microbiota in 79% of cases was dominated by Lactobacillus iners and/or Lactobacillus jensenii/Lactobacillus gasseri. The mean relative abundance of Prevotella bivia, Gardnerella vaginalis, Atopobium vaginae, and Megasphaera type I became significantly higher in cases 4 days before (P. bivia), 3 days before (G. vaginalis), and on the day of (A. vaginae and Megasphaera type I) iBV onset. The mean relative abundance of Sneathia sanguinegens, Finegoldia magna, BV-associated bacteria 1-3, and L. iners was not significantly different between groups before onset of iBV. Conclusion: G. vaginalis, P. bivia, A. vaginae, and Megasphaera type I may play significant roles in iBV.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/infdis/jiy243

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These studies have continued to support, although have not proven, the hypothesis that sexual behaviors, specific BV-associated bacteria, and possibly exchange of vaginal or extravaginal microbiota between partners might be involved in the pathogenesis of BV among WSW.

    “These studies have continued to support, although have not proven, the hypothesis that sexual behaviors, specific BV-associated bacteria, and possibly exchange of vaginal or extravaginal microbiota (e.g., oral bacterial communities) between partners might be involved in the pathogenesis of BV among WSW.”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [323]

    The paper’s introduction says BV epidemiology strongly indicates sexual transmission, and its Discussion reports that sexual activity coincided with changes in vaginal bacterial communities. Its conclusions also suggest that specific bacteria may help induce incident BV in women who have sex with women. It does not examine microbiota exchange between partners, including oral communities, so that part of the hypothesis remains unsupported by this paper (section labels provided; pages unavailable). (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A BV pathogenesis study in WSW reported that Prevotella bivia, Gardnerella vaginalis, and Atopobium vaginae might have substantial roles in development of incident BV.

    “A BV pathogenesis study in WSW reported that Prevotella bivia, Gardnerella vaginalis, and Atopobium vaginae might have substantial roles in development of incident BV (323).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [323]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ketterer MR, Rice PA, Gulati S, et al. Desialylation of neis- seria gonorrhoeae lipooligosaccharide by cervicovaginal microbiome sialidases: the potential for enhancing infectiv- ity in men. J Infect Dis 2016; 214:1621-8.
  2. Holm JB, Gajer P, Ravel J. PECAN: A fast, novel 16S rRNA gene sequence non-clustering based taxonomic assignment tool. 16th International Symposium on Microbial Ecology; 2016; Montreal, Canada.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muzny, C. A., Blanchard, E., Taylor, C. M., Aaron, K. J., Talluri, R., Griswold, M. E., Redden, D. T., Luo, M., Welsh, D. A., Van Der Pol, W. J., Lefkowitz, E. J., Martin, D. H., & Schwebke, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Division of Infectious Diseases, New Orleans, Louisiana
  • Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Parasitology, New Orleans, Louisiana
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
  • Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, New Orleans, Louisiana
  • Microbial Genomics Resource Group, School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana
  • Center for Clinical and Translational Science, New Orleans, Louisiana
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Tulane University (US)
Corresponding author
Muzny, Christina A
Venue
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
Published
2018-05-25
Volume
218
Issue
6
Pages
966-978
ISSN
  • 0022-1899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6613
OpenAlex
W2801244393
Cited by
145
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 2
FWCI
10.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (K23AI106957)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (P20GM103424)
  • Louisiana Biomedical Research Network (UL1TR001417)
  • University of Alabama-Birmingham Center for Clinical and Translational Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
Keywords
bacterial vaginosis, vaginal microbiota, Gardnerella vaginalis, Prevotella bivia, Atopobium vaginae, Megasphaera, Lactobacillus iners, Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus jensenii, Lactobacillus gasseri, African American women, women who have sex with women, vaginal dysbiosis, disease onset
MeSH terms
Adult, Black or African American, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Ribosomal, Female, Gardnerella vaginalis, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Prospective Studies, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Vagina, Vaginosis, Bacterial, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Prevotella, Megasphaera, Young Adult, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review