Cited by 177Syphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentVector-borne infectious diseasesReproductive tract infections research

Serological response to syphilis treatment in HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients attending sexually transmitted diseases clinics.

Open access
Ghanem, K G, Erbelding, E J, Wiener, Z S, Rompalo, A M·2007·Sexually Transmitted Infections

Abstract

BACKGROUND: HIV-positive patients treated for syphilis may be at increased risk for serological failure. OBJECTIVE: To compare follow-up serologies and serological responses to treatment between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients attending two sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinics. STUDY DESIGN: Existing records were reviewed from HIV-positive patients who were diagnosed and treated for syphilis at the public STD clinics in Baltimore, Maryland, USA, between 1992 and 2000. Results of their serological follow-up were compared with those of HIV-negative clinic patients at the time of syphilis treatment. Failure was defined as lack of a fourfold drop in rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titre by 400 days after treatment or a fourfold increased titre between 30 and 400 days. RESULTS: Of the 450 HIV-positive patients with syphilis, 288 (64%) did not have documented follow-up serologies and 129 (28.5%) met the inclusion criteria; 168 (17%) of 1000 known HIV-negative patients were similarly eligible. There were 22 failures in the HIV-positive group and 5 in the HIV-negative group (p<0.001). The median times to successful serological responses in both groups were 278 (95% confidence interval (CI) 209 to 350) and 126 (95% CI 108 to 157) days, respectively (p<0.001). A multivariate Cox's proportional hazards model showed an increased risk of serological failure among the HIV-positive patients (hazards ratio 6.0, 95% CI 1.5 to 23.9; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: HIV-positive patients treated for syphilis may be at higher risk of serological failure. Despite recommendations for more frequent serological follow-up, most patients did not have documentation of serological response after standard treatment for syphilis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/sti.2006.021402

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nontreponemal test titers might decrease more slowly for persons previously treated for syphilis.

    “In addition, nontreponemal test titers might decrease more slowly for persons previously treated for syphilis (594,595).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [594]

    The Results (page unavailable) mention a history of syphilis infection, but do not compare titre declines by prior treatment history. The paper compares response times by HIV status and syphilis stage; searches for prior treatment and serological response found no passage addressing whether previously treated patients’ titres decline more slowly. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Telzak EE, Greenberg MS, Harrison J, et al. Syphilis treatment response in HIV- infected individuals. AIDS 1991;5:591-5.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghanem, K. G., Erbelding, E. J., Wiener, Z. S., & Rompalo, A. M.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Ghanem, K G
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2006-08-30
Volume
83
Issue
2
Pages
97-101
ISSN
  • 0007-134X (ISSN-L)
  • 1368-4973
OpenAlex
W2025129013
Cited by
177
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Infections (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI045724)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Syphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
syphilis, HIV infection, treatment response, serological follow-up, sexually transmitted infections, people living with HIV
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Hematologic Diseases, HIV Seropositivity, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reagins, Syphilis, Proportional Hazards Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review