The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring sexual behaviour: methodological challenges in survey research
Open accessAbstract
Series editors J M Stephenson, A Babiker The study of sexual behaviour lies at the heart of understanding the transmission dynamics of sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Academic investigation into sexual behaviour dates back to the 18th century and, over time, has employed a variety of approaches including the medical and psychiatric investigation of sexual disorders, anthropological investigations, and survey research based largely on volunteer samples. More recent studies, driven largely by the public health response to HIV/AIDS, have focused on large scale probability sample survey research.1–5 Key areas of inquiry have shifted towards describing population patterns of risk behaviours for STI/HIV transmission, understanding how epidemics of STIs are generated, and informing disease control strategies. Sexual behaviour is a largely private activity, subject to varying degrees of social, cultural, religious, moral and legal norms and constraints. A key challenge for all sex survey research is to generate unbiased and precise measures of individual and population behaviour patterns. Methods are needed to minimise measurement error which may be introduced by participation bias, recall and comprehension problems, and respondents' willingness to report sensitive and sometimes socially censured attitudes or behaviours.6, 7 This paper briefly considers the role of different types of study in understanding STI epidemiology. It then focuses on potential sources of measurement error in survey research and strategies for assessing and limiting them.Sex Transm Inf 2001;77:84–92 The type of study chosen will depend on the purpose of the investigation. However, studies generally fall into four main groups: general population surveys, studies on population subgroups, partner and network studies, ethnographic and qualitative studies. ### GENERAL POPULATION PROBABILITY SAMPLE SURVEYS Cross sectional population surveys aim to describe the overall distribution of behaviours in populations. By using probability sampling techniques and maximising response rates, large scale behavioural surveys can provide robust estimates of the prevalence …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dunne, M., Martin, N., Bailey, J., Heath, A., Bucholz, K., Madden, P., & Statham, D. (1997) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/26.4.844 · Cited by 188 · cited 2×
“38 48 A sensitivity analysis approach may then be employed to calculate and present parameter estimates, which take into account di V erent assumptions of this (participation bias) e V ect.”
BackgroundMethodChandiramani, R. (1998) · Reproductive Health Matters · doi:10.1016/s0968-8080(98)90010-6 · Cited by 28
Cited by
A Study of sexuality and health among older adults in the United States
Lindau, S. T., Schumm, L. P., Laumann, E. O., Levinson, W., O'Muircheartaigh, C. A., & Waite, L. J. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa067423 · Cited by 2,211
Lindau, S. T., & Gavrilova, N. (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c810 · Cited by 528
Beymer, M. R., Weiss, R. E., Bolan, R. K., Rudy, E. T., Bourque, L. B., Rodriguez, J. P., & Morisky, D. E. (2014) · Sexually Transmitted Infections · doi:10.1136/sextrans-2013-051494 · Cited by 262
Interactive computer-based interventions for sexual health promotion
Bailey, J. V., Murray, E., Rait, G., Mercer, C. H., Morris, R. W., Peacock, R., Cassell, J., & Nazareth, I. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006483.pub2 · Cited by 183
Chapter 21: Modelling the impact of HPV vaccines on cervical cancer and screening programmes
Garnett, G. P., Kim, J. J., French, K., & Goldie, S. J. (2006) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.116 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Fenton, K. A.
- Venue
- Sexually Transmitted Infections
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-04-01
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 84-92
- ISSN
- 0007-134X (ISSN-L)
- 1368-4973
- OpenAlex
- W1973078451
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 40.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring sexual behaviour: methodological challenges in survey research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/sti.77.2.84
- The paper
- Fenton, K. A. (2001). Measuring sexual behaviour: methodological challenges in survey research. Sexually Transmitted Infections. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.77.2.84
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.