The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Teen smoking cessation
Open accessAbstract
Objective To assess the quality of guidelines, consensus statements and systematic reviews on flu and pneumococcal immunisations in HIV-infected children. Method The authors screened PubMed and Embase databases until the year 2009 for guidelines, consensus statements and systematic reviews on flu and pneumococcal immunisations in HIV-infected patients. The authors also explored relevant websites of agencies/institutions involved with HIV infection, immunisation or guidelines. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation instrument and the checklists of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network were used to evaluate the scientific quality of guidelines and systematic reviews. Results Eighteen articles were identified. Only one guideline was of good overall quality. Generally the weakest domains were ‘Applicability’ and ‘Editorial Independence.’ Although of poor methodological quality, the main recommendations on flu and pneumococcus vaccinations were similar. There were minor differences in the type of pneumococcal vaccines in relation to patient9s age, namely based on the settings in which recommendations were produced. Conclusions Although guidelines and systematic reviews on flu and pneumococcal vaccination in HIV-infected children came from authoritative institutions, their overall quality is poor, with the weakest fields being the methodological domains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“without intervention, very few adolescent smokers quit smoking”
From Behavioral trainings and manipulations to reduce delay discounting: A systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as Mermelstein, 2003
In the citing paper
“smoking during adolescence has a direct negative effect on youth’s health and is a significant predictor of nicotine dependence in adulthood”
From Behavioral trainings and manipulations to reduce delay discounting: A systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as Mermelstein, 2003
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Norcross, J. C., Krebs, P. M., & Prochaska, J. O. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.20758 · Cited by 1,065
Panel, S. T. T. U. A. D. C. P. G. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.24.3244 · Cited by 832
Kobus, K. (2003) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.98.s1.4.x · Cited by 709
Preventing Tobacco Use Among Young People: A Report of the Surgeon General
(1994) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e601082007-001 · Cited by 690
Initial symptoms of nicotine dependence in adolescents
DiFranza, J. R. (2000) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.9.3.313 · Cited by 574
Chassin, L., Presson, C. C., Pitts, S. C., & Sherman, S. J. (2000) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.3.223 · Cited by 465
Preventing Tobacco use Among Young People
Schinke, S. P., & Gilchrist, L. D. (1986) · Health & Social Work · doi:10.1093/hsw/11.1.59 · Cited by 401
Reducing Tobacco Use: A Report of the Surgeon General
(2000) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e600972007-001 · Cited by 366
Reducing Tobacco Use: A Report of the Surgeon General
(2000) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e547982006-001 · Cited by 351
Brief motivational interviewing in a hospital setting for adolescent smoking: A preliminary study.
Colby, S. M., Monti, P. M., Barnett, N. P., Rohsenow, D. J., Weissman, K., Spirito, A., Woolard, R. H., & Lewander, W. J. (1998) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.66.3.574 · Cited by 329
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Sussman S, Dent CW, Lichtman KL. Project EX: outcomes of a teen smoking cessation program. Addict Behav 2001;26:425-38.
- Teen smoking cessation i33 www.tobaccocontrol.com on August 15, 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/ Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tc.12.suppl_1.i25 on 1 June 2003. Downloaded from
- Moolchan E, Mermelstein R. Tobacco research among teenagers: the bumpy road of ethical challenges. J Adolesc Health 2002;30:409-17.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Public Health Implications of Raising the Minimum Age of Legal Access to Tobacco Products
Board on Population Health and Public Health Practice (2015) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/18997 · Cited by 347
Tobacco and marijuana use among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review of their co-use
Ramo, D. E., Liu, H., & Prochaska, J. J. (2011) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2011.12.002 · Cited by 339
Ginzel, K. H., Maritz, G. S., Marks, D. F., Neuberger, M., Pauly, J., Polito, J. R., Schulte‐Hermann, R., & Slotkin, T. A. (2007) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105307074240 · Cited by 234
Tobacco cessation interventions for young people.
Fanshawe, T. R., Halliwell, W., Lindson, N., Aveyard, P., Livingstone-Banks, J., & Hartmann-Boyce, J. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003289.pub6 · Cited by 196
Txt2stop: a pilot randomised controlled trial of mobile phone-based smoking cessation support
Free, C., Whittaker, R., Knight, R., Abramsky, T., Rodgers, A., & Roberts, I. G. (2009) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.2008.026146 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Mermelstein, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mermelstein, R
- ORCID
- Mermelstein, R
- Venue
- Tobacco Control
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2003-06-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 90001
- Pages
- 25i-34
- ISSN
- 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC1766088
- OpenAlex
- W2023818705
- Cited by
- 144
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 1.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Tobacco Control (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Cancer Society
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Keywords
- smoking cessation, adolescents, tobacco use, guideline quality, influenza vaccination, pneumococcal vaccination, HIV-infected children, vaccine recommendations
- MeSH terms
- Smoking Prevention, Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Health Education, Health Services, Humans, Schools, Smoking, Smoking Cessation, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review