The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Methods of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey
Open accessAbstract
This paper outlines the design features, data collection methods and analytic strategies of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey, a prospective study of more than 2000 longitudinal respondents per country with yearly replenishments. This survey possesses unique features that sets it apart among surveys on tobacco use and cessation. One of these features is the use of theory-driven conceptual models. In this paper, however, the focus is on the two key statistical features of the survey: longitudinal and “quasi-experimental” designs. Although it is often possible to address the same scientific questions with a cross-sectional or a longitudinal study, the latter has the major advantage of being able to distinguish changes over time within individuals from differences among people at baseline (that is, differences between age and cohort effects). Furthermore, quasi-experiments, where countries not implementing a given new tobacco control policy act as the control group to which the country implementing such a policy will be compared, provide much stronger evidence than observational studies on the effects of national-level tobacco control policies. In summary, application of rigorous research methods enables this survey to be a rich data resource, not only to evaluate policies, but also to gain new insights into the natural history of smoking cessation, through longitudinal analyses of smoker behaviour.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.7.1.83 · Cited by 9,406
Cited by
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems
Adkison, S. E., O'Connor, R. J., Bansal-Travers, M., Hyland, A., Borland, R., Yong, H.-H., Cummings, K. M., McNeill, A., Thrasher, J. F., Hammond, D., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.10.018 · Cited by 699
Self-citationText and Graphic Warnings on Cigarette Packages
Hammond, D., Fong, G. T., Borland, R., Cummings, K. M., McNeill, A., & Driezen, P. (2007) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2006.11.011 · Cited by 434
Self-citationBorland, R., Yong, H. H., O'Connor, R. J., Hyland, A., & Thompson, M. E. (2010) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntq038 · Cited by 371
Self-citationSiahpush, M., Yong, H., Borland, R., Reid, J. L., & Hammond, D. (2009) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02599.x · Cited by 142
Self-citationKulak, J. A., Cornelius, M. E., Fong, G. T., & Giovino, G. A. (2016) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/ntv228 · Cited by 124
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, M. E., Fong, G. T., Hammond, D., Boudreau, C., Driezen, P., Hyland, A., Borland, R., Cummings, K. M., Hastings, G. B., Siahpush, M., Mackintosh, A. M., & Laux, F. L.
- Venue
- Tobacco Control
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- suppl 3
- Pages
- iii12-iii18
- ISSN
- 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3318
- OpenAlex
- W2143000453
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methods of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/tc.2005.013870
- The paper
- Thompson, M. E., Fong, G. T., Hammond, D., Boudreau, C., Driezen, P., Hyland, A., Borland, R., Cummings, K. M., Hastings, G. B., Siahpush, M., Mackintosh, A. M., & Laux, F. L. (2006). Methods of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tobacco Control. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2005.013870
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.