Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 340

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Methods of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey

Open access
Thompson, M E, Fong, G T, Hammond, D, Boudreau, C, Driezen, P, Hyland, A, Borland, R, Cummings, K M, Hastings, G B, Siahpush, M, Mackintosh, A M, Laux, F L·2006·Tobacco Control

Abstract

This paper outlines the design features, data collection methods and analytic strategies of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey, a prospective study of more than 2000 longitudinal respondents per country with yearly replenishments. This survey possesses unique features that sets it apart among surveys on tobacco use and cessation. One of these features is the use of theory-driven conceptual models. In this paper, however, the focus is on the two key statistical features of the survey: longitudinal and “quasi-experimental” designs. Although it is often possible to address the same scientific questions with a cross-sectional or a longitudinal study, the latter has the major advantage of being able to distinguish changes over time within individuals from differences among people at baseline (that is, differences between age and cohort effects). Furthermore, quasi-experiments, where countries not implementing a given new tobacco control policy act as the control group to which the country implementing such a policy will be compared, provide much stronger evidence than observational studies on the effects of national-level tobacco control policies. In summary, application of rigorous research methods enables this survey to be a rich data resource, not only to evaluate policies, but also to gain new insights into the natural history of smoking cessation, through longitudinal analyses of smoker behaviour.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/tc.2005.013870

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 340

Metadata

Authors
Thompson, M. E., Fong, G. T., Hammond, D., Boudreau, C., Driezen, P., Hyland, A., Borland, R., Cummings, K. M., Hastings, G. B., Siahpush, M., Mackintosh, A. M., & Laux, F. L.
Venue
Tobacco Control
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2006-06
Volume
15
Issue
suppl 3
Pages
iii12-iii18
ISSN
  • 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3318
OpenAlex
W2143000453
Cited by
340
References
1
FWCI
10.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methods of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/tc.2005.013870
The paper
Thompson, M. E., Fong, G. T., Hammond, D., Boudreau, C., Driezen, P., Hyland, A., Borland, R., Cummings, K. M., Hastings, G. B., Siahpush, M., Mackintosh, A. M., & Laux, F. L. (2006). Methods of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tobacco Control. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2005.013870

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.