The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems
Open accessAbstract
Background Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) initially emerged in 2003 and have since become widely available globally, particularly over the Internet. Purpose Data on ENDS usage patterns are limited. The current paper examines patterns of ENDS awareness, use, and product-associated beliefs among current and former smokers in four countries. Methods Data come from Wave 8 of the International Tobacco Control Four-Country Survey, collected July 2010 to June 2011 and analyzed through June 2012. Respondents included 5939 current and former smokers in Canada (n=1581); the U.S. (n=1520); the United Kingdom (UK; n=1325); and Australia (n=1513). Results Overall, 46.6% were aware of ENDS (U.S.: 73%, UK: 54%, Canada: 40%, Australia: 20%); 7.6% had tried ENDS (16% of those aware of ENDS); and 2.9% were current users (39% of triers). Awareness of ENDS was higher among younger, non-minority smokers with higher incomes who were heavier smokers. Prevalence of trying ENDS was higher among younger, nondaily smokers with a high income and among those who perceived ENDS as less harmful than traditional cigarettes. Current use was higher among both nondaily and heavy (≥20 cigarettes per day) smokers. In all, 79.8% reported using ENDS because they were considered less harmful than traditional cigarettes; 75.4% stated that they used ENDS to help them reduce their smoking; and 85.1% reported using ENDS to help them quit smoking. Conclusions Awareness of ENDS is high, especially in countries where they are legal (i.e., the U.S. and UK). Because trial was associated with nondaily smoking and a desire to quit smoking, ENDS may have potential to serve as a cessation aid.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Etter, J.-F., & Bullen, C. (2011) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03505.x · Cited by 677
e-Cigarette Awareness, Use, and Harm Perceptions in US Adults
Pearson, J. L., Richardson, A., Niaura, R. S., Vallone, D. M., & Abrams, D. B. (2012) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2011.300526 · Cited by 511
Electronic nicotine delivery systems: adult use and awareness of the ‘e-cigarette’ in the USA
Regan, A. K., Promoff, G., Dube, S. R., & Arrazola, R. (2013) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050044 · Cited by 490
Polosa, R., Caponnetto, P., Morjaria, J. B., Papale, G., Campagna, D., & Russo, C. (2011) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-786 · Cited by 432
Electronic cigarettes: a survey of users
Etter, J.-F. (2010) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-10-231 · Cited by 421
The conceptual framework of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation Project
Fong, G. T., Cummings, K. M., Borland, R., Hastings, G., Hyland, A., Giovino, G. A., Hammond, D., & Thompson, M. E. (2006) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.2005.015438 · Cited by 412
Self-citationCahn, Z., & Siegel, M. (2011) · Journal of Public Health Policy · doi:10.1057/jphp.2010.41 · Cited by 409
Methods of the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey
Thompson, M. E., Fong, G. T., Hammond, D., Boudreau, C., Driezen, P., Hyland, A., Borland, R., Cummings, K. M., Hastings, G. B., Siahpush, M., et al. (2006) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.2005.013870 · Cited by 340
Self-citationAyers, J. W., Ribisl, K. M., & Brownstein, J. S. (2011) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.007 · Cited by 300
Electronic Cigarettes As a Smoking-Cessation Tool
Siegel, M. B., Tanwar, K. L., & Wood, K. S. (2011) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.006 · Cited by 268
Cited by
E-Cigarettes: A Scientific Review
Grana, R., Benowitz, N., & Glantz, S. A. (2014) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.114.007667 · Cited by 1,194
Kalkhoran, S., & Glantz, S. A. (2016) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(15)00521-4 · Cited by 895
Farsalinos, K. E., & Polosa, R. (2014) · Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety · doi:10.1177/2042098614524430 · Cited by 594
Hajek, P., Etter, J., Benowitz, N., Eissenberg, T., & McRobbie, H. (2014) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.12659 · Cited by 546
Smoking, Mental Illness, and Public Health
Prochaska, J. J., Das, S., & Young-Wolff, K. C. (2017) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044618 · Cited by 503
“, e-cigarettes, e-hookahs, vape pens) is growing in the United States and internationally (3, 10, 39, 49, 65).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Adkison, S. E., O'Connor, R. J., Bansal-Travers, M., Hyland, A., Borland, R., Yong, H.-H., Cummings, K. M., McNeill, A., Thrasher, J. F., Hammond, D., & Fong, G. T.
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 207-215
- ISSN
- 0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2100322844
- Cited by
- 699
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 66.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.10.018
- The paper
- Adkison, S. E., O'Connor, R. J., Bansal-Travers, M., Hyland, A., Borland, R., Yong, H.-H., Cummings, K. M., McNeill, A., Thrasher, J. F., Hammond, D., & Fong, G. T. (2013). Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.10.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.