The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explaining the social gradient in smoking cessation: it’s not in the trying, but in the succeeding: Table 1
Abstract
Objective: Smokers from more deprived socioeconomic groups are less likely to become ex-smokers. This study examined how far this is attributable in England to a social gradient in quit attempts, use of aids to cessation and/or the success of quit attempts. Design: Cross-sectional household survey. Setting: England. Participants: 6950 respondents aged 16+ who had smoked in the past year, of whom 2983 had tried to stop in the past year and 469 reported having stopped at the time of the survey. Main outcome measures: Reported attempts to stop smoking in the past year; the use of stop-smoking medications (nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion or varenicline); use of behavioural support offered by the National Health Service Stop Smoking Services; current smoking status. Results: There was a large difference in success rates of quit attempts: 20.4% in social grade AB versus 11.4% in social grade E of those who made attempts were still not smoking by the time of the survey (p<0.001). However, there was no difference across social grades in the rate of attempts to stop (42.7% in social grade AB to 41.3% in E), use of medications to aid cessation (46.7% of those making quit attempts in AB to 50.9% in E) or use of NHS Stop Smoking Services (7.0% of those making quit attempts in AB to 4.8% in E). Conclusions: Smokers in more deprived socioeconomic groups are just as likely as those in higher groups to try to stop and use aids to cessation but there is a strong gradient across socioeconomic groups in success, with those in the lowest group being half as likely to succeed compared with the highest. Determining the cause of, and counteracting, this gradient is paramount in reducing health inequalities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire
HEATHERTON, T. F., KOZLOWSKI, L. T., FRECKER, R. C., & FAGERSTROM, K. (1991) · British Journal of Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x · Cited by 10,738
Tudor Hart, J. (1971) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(71)92410-x · Cited by 3,253
Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1): Figure 1
Galobardes, B., Shaw, M., Lawlor, D. A., Lynch, J. W., & Davey Smith, G. (2006) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2004.023531 · Cited by 2,867
Jha, P., Peto, R., Zatonski, W., Boreham, J., Jarvis, M. J., & Lopez, A. D. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68975-7 · Cited by 863
The General Household Survey 1974
Hope, K., & O., H. M. S. (1978) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/589665 · Cited by 670
Hyland, A., Borland, R., Li, Q., Yong, H.-H., McNeill, A., Fong, G. T., O’Connor, R. J., & Cummings, K. M. (2006) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.2005.013516 · Cited by 507
Siahpush, M., McNeill, A., Borland, R., & Fong, G. T. (2006) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.2004.008763 · Cited by 328
Smoking cessation and smoking patterns in the general population: a 1‐year follow‐up
West, R., McEwen, A., Bolling, K., & Owen, L. (2001) · Addiction · doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96689110.x · Cited by 304
Self-citationMelkman, J. (1961) · Gazette (Leiden, Netherlands) · doi:10.1177/001654926100700118 · Cited by 233
Siahpush, M., & Carlin, J. B. (2006) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01292.x · Cited by 204
Cited by
Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review
Hiscock, R., Bauld, L., Amos, A., Fidler, J. A., & Munafò, M. (2012) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06202.x · Cited by 1,572
Twyman, L., Bonevski, B., Paul, C., & Bryant, J. (2014) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006414 · Cited by 462
'The smoking toolkit study': a national study of smoking and smoking cessation in England
Fidler, J. A., Shahab, L., West, O., Jarvis, M. J., McEwen, A., Stapleton, J. A., Vangeli, E., & West, R. (2011) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-479 · Cited by 311
Self-citationKotz, D., Brown, J., & West, R. (2014) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.12429 · Cited by 283
Self-citationHiscock, R., Judge, K., & Bauld, L. (2011) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdq097 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Kotz, D., & West, R.
- Venue
- Tobacco Control
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2008-10-20
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-46
- ISSN
- 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3318
- OpenAlex
- W2105254196
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 9.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explaining the social gradient in smoking cessation: it’s not in the trying, but in the succeeding: Table 1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/tc.2008.025981
- The paper
- Kotz, D., & West, R. (2009). Explaining the social gradient in smoking cessation: it’s not in the trying, but in the succeeding: Table 1. Tobacco Control. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2008.025981
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.