Cited by 167Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesHealth disparities and outcomes

Social inequalities in quitting smoking: what factors mediate the relationship between socioeconomic position and smoking cessation?

Open access
Hiscock, R., Judge, K., Bauld, L.·2011·Journal of Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Smokers from lower socio-economic groups are less likely to be successful in a quit attempt than more affluent smokers, even when they access smoking cessation services. METHODS: Data were collected from smoking cessation service users from three contrasting areas of Great Britain-Glasgow, North Cumbria and Nottingham. Routine monitoring data were supplemented with CO-validated smoking status at 52-week follow-up and survey data on socio-economic circumstances and smoking-related behaviour. Analysis was restricted to the 2397 clients aged between 25 and 59. RESULTS: At 52-week follow-up, 14.3% of the most affluent smokers remained quit compared with only 5.3% of the most disadvantaged. After adjustment for demographic factors, the most advantaged clients at the English sites and the Glasgow one-to-one programme were significantly more likely to have remained abstinent than those who were most disadvantaged [odds ratio: 2.5, confidence interval (CI): 1.4-4.7 and 7.5 CI: 1.4-40.3, respectively). Mechanisms producing the inequalities appeared to include treatment compliance, household smokers and referral source. CONCLUSIONS: Rather than quitting smoking, disadvantaged smokers quit treatment. More should be done to encourage them to persevere through the first few weeks. Other causes of inequalities in quitting varied with the service provided.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/pubmed/fdq097

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [39]39. Lomas C, Al-Khairalla M, Winter J. Socioeconomic status is an independent factor for smoking cessation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A population-based observational study. Thorax. 2008 Dec;63:A76-A7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hiscock, R., Judge, K., & Bauld, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Bath (GB)
  • University of Stirling (GB)
Corresponding author
Bauld, L.
Venue
Journal of Public Health
Published
2010-12-22
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
39-47
ISSN
  • 0943-1853 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3842
  • 1741-3850
OpenAlex
W2117005514
Cited by
167
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion)
  • The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007489/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
smoking cessation, social inequality, socioeconomic position, smoking cessation services, medication adherence, household smoking, referral sources, abstinence
MeSH terms
Adult, England, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Scotland, Smoking, Social Class, Social Support, State Medicine, Program Evaluation, Logistic Models, Smoking Cessation, Program Development, Drug Monitoring, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review