Effectiveness of tax and price policies in tobacco control: Table 1
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Over 20 experts on economics, epidemiology, public policy and tobacco control were asked by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) to evaluate the strength of the available evidence on the effects of tax and price policies to prevent and reduce tobacco use. Methods: Draft papers presenting and assessing the evidence on the following topics were developed by the experts in an 8-month period prior to the meeting: tobacco industry pricing strategies and tax related lobbying; tax, price and aggregate demand for tobacco; tax, price and adult tobacco use, use among young people and use among the poor; tax avoidance and tax evasion; and the economic and health impact of tobacco taxation. Subsequently, papers were peer reviewed, revised and resubmitted for final discussion at a 6-day meeting at IARC in Lyon, France, where a consensus evaluation of 18 concluding statements using the pre-established criteria of the IARC Cancer Prevention Handbooks took place. Studies published (or accepted for publication) in the openly available scientific literature were the main source of evidence for the review and evaluation; other types of publications were included when appropriate. Results: In support of 12 of the 18 conclusions, the experts agreed that there was sufficient evidence of effectiveness of increased tobacco excise taxes and prices in reducing overall tobacco consumption and prevalence of tobacco use and improvement of public health, including by preventing initiation and uptake among young people, promoting cessation among current users and lowering consumption among those who continue to use. For the remaining six concluding statements the evidence was strong (four statements) or limited (two statements). Conclusions: The evidence presented and assessed in IARC Handbook volume 14 documents the effectiveness of tax and price policies in the control of tobacco use and improvement of public health.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tobacco taxes reduce initiation among youth, demand and consumption among current smokers, and relapse among former smokers.
“Tobacco taxes reduce initiation among youth, demand and consumption among current smokers, and relapse among former smokers.5–10”
From Seven-year tobacco tax plan in Ukraine: a case study of the actors, tactics and factors motivating policy passage (2022) · cites this paper as [5]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reitsma, M. B., Kendrick, P. J., Ababneh, E., Abbafati, C., Abbasi-Kangevari, M., Abdoli, A., Abedi, A., Abhilash, E. S., Abila, D. B., Aboyans, V., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01169-7 · Cited by 1,759 · see citing works
Verguet, S., Gauvreau, C. L., Mishra, S., MacLennan, M., Murphy, S. M., Brouwer, E. D., Nugent, R. A., Zhao, K., Jha, P., & Jamison, D. T. (2015) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(15)70095-1 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Tobacco control progress in low and middle income countries in comparison to high income countries
Anderson, C., Becher, H., & Winkler, V. (2016) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph13101039 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Paraje, G. R., Jha, P., Savedoff, W., & Fuchs, A. (2023) · BMJ Global Health · doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2023-011866 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Tobacco control in the Russian Federation- a policy analysis
Lunze, K., & Migliorini, L. (2013) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-64 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Fleischer, N. L., Thrasher, J. F., Reynales-Shigematsu, L. M., Cummings, K. M., Meza, R., Zhang, Y., & Levy, D. T. (2017) · Global Public Health · doi:10.1080/17441692.2015.1123749 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Weiger, C., Hoe, C., & Cohen, J. E. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049833 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chaloupka, F. J., Straif, K., & Leon, M. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Leon, Maria E
- Venue
- Tobacco Control
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2010-11-29
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 235-238
- ISSN
- 0964-4563 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3318
- OpenAlex
- W2151190803
- Cited by
- 605
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 17.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hal.science
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Tobacco Control (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (acceptedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Fiscal Studies
- Keywords
- tobacco excise tax, tobacco pricing, tobacco control, tobacco use, youth tobacco initiation, tobacco cessation, tobacco industry lobbying, tax avoidance, tax evasion, tobacco demand
- MeSH terms
- Smoking Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Commerce, Health Policy, Health Promotion, Humans, Smoking, Taxes, Health Behavior, Smoking Cessation, Evidence-Based Medicine, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review