Cited by 12Smoking Behavior and CessationGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Mexico SimSmoke: how changes in tobacco control policies would impact smoking prevalence and smoking attributable deaths in Mexico

Open access
Fleischer, Nancy L., Thrasher, James F., Reynales-Shigematsu, Luz Myriam, Cummings, K. Michael, Meza, Rafael, Zhang, Yian, Levy, David T.·2017·Global Public Health

Abstract

We examined the effect of tobacco control policies in Mexico on smoking prevalence and smoking-related deaths using the Mexico SimSmoke model. The model is based on the previously developed SimSmoke simulation model of tobacco control policy, and uses population size, smoking rates and tobacco control policy data for Mexico. It assesses, individually, and in combination, the effect of six tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence and smoking-related deaths. Policies included: cigarette excise taxes, smoke-free laws, anti-smoking public education campaigns, marketing restrictions, access to tobacco cessation treatments and enforcement against tobacco sales youth. The model estimates that, if Mexico were to adopt strong tobacco control policies compared to current policy levels, smoking prevalence could be reduced by 30% in the next decade and by 50% by 2053; an additional 470,000 smoking-related premature deaths could be averted over the next 40 years. The greatest impact on smoking and smoking-related deaths would be achieved by raising excise taxes on cigarettes from 55% to at least 70% of the retail price, followed by strong youth access enforcement and access to cessation treatments. Implementing tobacco control policies in Mexico could reduce smoking prevalence by 50%, and prevent 470,000 smoking-related deaths by 2053.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17441692.2015.1123749

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Jee SH Lee JK Kim IS Smoking-attributable mortality among Korean adults: 1981–2003 Korean Journal of Epidemiology 2006 28 1 92 99
  2. Levy D Blackman K Fong GT Chaloupka F Fong G Chaloupka F Yurekli A The role of tobacco control policies in reducing smoking and deaths in the eighteen heavy burden nations: Results from the MPOWER SimSmoke Tobacco Control Policy Model NCI monograph: Tobacco control policies in low and middle income nations Rockville (in press)
  3. Merriman D Yurekli A Chaloupka F Jha P Chaloupka F How big is the worldwide cigarette smuggling problem Tobacco control in developing countries 2000 365 392 Oxford University Press New York, NY
  4. Thrasher JF Murukutla N Perez-Hernandez R Alday J Arillo-Santillan E Cedillo C Gutierrez JP Linking mass media campaigns to pictorial warning labels on cigarette packages: A cross-sectional study to evaluate effects among Mexican smokers Tobacco Control 2013b 22 E1 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050282 22752271 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fleischer, N. L., Thrasher, J. F., Reynales-Shigematsu, L. M., Cummings, K. M., Meza, R., Zhang, Y., & Levy, D. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (MX)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
Corresponding author
Fleischer, Nancy L.
Venue
Global Public Health
Published
2016-02-02
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
830-845
ISSN
  • 1744-1692 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-1706
OpenAlex
W2276502847
Cited by
12
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Global Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Mexican Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (Salud-2007-C01–70032)
  • Medical University of South Carolina's Center for Global Health (CGH)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
tobacco control, smoking prevalence, smoking-related mortality, cigarette excise tax, smoking bans, tobacco marketing restrictions, tobacco cessation treatment, Mexico
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Health Policy, Humans, Male, Mexico, Middle Aged, Smoking, Prevalence, Young Adult, Tobacco Use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review