The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We used widely accepted iterative 'snowball' sampling techniques, which have been detailed in previous tobacco industry document research. 21 22”
From Tobacco industry misappropriation of American Indian culture and traditional tobacco (2018) · cites this paper as [22]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chaloupka, F. J., Cummings, K. M., Morley, C., & Horan, J. (2002) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.11.suppl_1.i62 · Cited by 342
Crosbie, E., Sosa, P., & Glantz, S. A. (2018) · Tobacco control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053690 · Cited by 96
Tobacco industry misappropriation of American Indian culture and traditional tobacco
D’Silva, J., O’Gara, E., & Villaluz, N. T. (2018) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053950 · Cited by 54
Lempert, L. K., & Glantz, S. A. (2019) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1093/ntr/nty048 · Cited by 53
Crosbie, E., Sosa, P., & Glantz, S. A. (2017) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052701 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Malone, R. E.
- Venue
- Tobacco Control
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-09-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 334-338
- ISSN
- 0964-4563
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/tc.9.3.334
- The paper
- Malone, R. E. (2000). Tobacco industry documents: treasure trove or quagmire? Tobacco Control. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.9.3.334
