Cited by 144Occupational exposure and asthmaAsthma and respiratory diseasesIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

Asthma symptoms in women employed in domestic cleaning: a community based study

Open access
Medina-Ramon, M·2003·Thorax

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies have shown an association between cleaning work and asthma, but the risk factors are uncertain. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of asthma in women employed in domestic cleaning. METHODS: A cross sectional study was conducted in 4521 women aged 30 to 65 years. Information on respiratory symptoms and cleaning work history was obtained using a postal questionnaire with telephone follow up. Asthma was defined as reported symptoms in the last year or current use of drugs to treat asthma. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for asthma in different cleaning groups were estimated using adjusted unconditional logistic regression models. RESULTS: 593 women (13%) were currently employed in domestic cleaning work. Asthma was more prevalent in this group than in women who had never worked in cleaning (OR 1.46 (95% CI, 1.10 to 1.92)). Former domestic cleaning work was reported by 1170 women (26%), and was strongly associated with asthma (OR 2.09 (1.70 to 2.57)). Current and former non-domestic cleaning work was not significantly associated with asthma. Consistent results were obtained for other respiratory symptoms. Twenty five per cent of the asthma cases in the study population were attributable to domestic cleaning work. CONCLUSIONS: Employment in domestic cleaning may induce or aggravate asthma. This study suggests that domestic cleaning work has an important public health impact, probably involving not only professional cleaners but also people undertaking cleaning tasks at home.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/thorax.58.11.950

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exposure to certain chlorine-related agents and possibly also to other cleaning agents aggravates asthma symptoms in domestic cleaners.

    “Exposure to certain chlorine-related agents and possibly also to other cleaning agents aggravates asthma symptoms in domestic cleaners 18–20.”

    From Exposure to trichloramine and respiratory symptoms in indoor swimming pool workers (2007) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Discussion (page not specified in our copy) hypothesises that exposure to cleaning products could contribute to the onset or aggravation of asthma in domestic cleaners. It does not identify chlorine-related agents as responsible, and it presents aggravation as a hypothesis rather than an established effect. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Other studies have reported that exposure to irritants can cause irritation and inflammatory effects on the airways.

    “Other studies have reported that exposure to irritants can cause irritation and inflammatory effects on the airways 7, 18–20.”

    From Exposure to trichloramine and respiratory symptoms in indoor swimming pool workers (2007) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says domestic cleaners encounter products containing irritants and hypothesises that an irritant-induced mechanism could cause or aggravate asthma. It does not report airway irritation or inflammatory effects specifically, and presents the mechanism as a hypothesis rather than an established effect. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Reinisch F, Harrison RJ, Cussler S, et al. Physician reports of work-related asthma in California, 1993-1996. Am J Ind Med 2001;39:72-83.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Medina-Ramon, M.
Venue
Thorax
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2003-11-01
Volume
58
Issue
11
Pages
950-954
ISSN
0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160231509
Cited by
144
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Thorax (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (C03/09)
  • Departament d'Universitats, Recerca i Societat de la Informació
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Keywords
asthma, occupational asthma, women, respiratory symptoms, attributable risk, household cleaning
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Asthma, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Household Work, Humans, Hygiene, Middle Aged, Occupational Diseases, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Spain, Prevalence, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review