Cited by 93Occupational exposure and asthmaAsthma and respiratory diseasesIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

Asthma characteristics in cleaning workers, workers in other risk jobs and office workers

Open access
Zock, J.P., Kogevinas, M., Sunyer, J., Jarvis, D., Torén, K., Antó, J.M.·2002·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Several studies have demonstrated an excess risk for asthma among cleaning workers. The aim of this analysis was to compare clinical, immunological and functional characteristics associated with asthma in cleaners and other occupational groups. Cleaners, workers exposed to high molecular weight (MW) agents, workers exposed to low MW agents, and office workers were identified from an international community-based epidemiological study. Influence of sex, smoking, age and atopy on the relationships with asthma was investigated. Rates of respiratory symptoms, bronchial hyperresponsiveness, atopic sensitisation and lung function were compared between asthmatics from the four groups (case-case analysis). The risk for asthma in workers exposed to low MW agents was higher among nonatopics than among atopics. Case-case analysis showed no major differences in asthma characteristics between cleaners and workers exposed to high or low MW agents. Asthmatic cleaners had less atopy, more chronic bronchitis and a lower lung function as compared to office workers. Asthma in cleaning workers showed many similarities with that in workers known to be at risk for occupational asthma. Atopic sensitisation did not seem to play an important role in cleaning-related asthma.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.02.00279702

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies have reported that exposure to irritants can cause irritation and inflammatory effects on the airways.

    “Other studies have reported that exposure to irritants can cause irritation and inflammatory effects on the airways 7, 18–20.”

    From Exposure to trichloramine and respiratory symptoms in indoor swimming pool workers (2007) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Discussion reports more productive cough among cleaners with asthma and speculates that regular irritant exposure may lead to mucus hypersecretion and chronic bronchitis. It does not establish that irritants cause these effects or report inflammatory effects on the airways. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Exposure to certain chlorine-related agents and possibly also to other cleaning agents aggravates asthma symptoms in domestic cleaners.

    “Exposure to certain chlorine-related agents and possibly also to other cleaning agents aggravates asthma symptoms in domestic cleaners 18–20.”

    From Exposure to trichloramine and respiratory symptoms in indoor swimming pool workers (2007) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Abstract reports that cleaning products may be associated with work-aggravated asthma and identifies chlorine as a potentially responsible agent. The Discussion notes a reported excess asthma risk in domestic cleaning, but says this study could not assess specific products or cleaning settings. It therefore does not establish that chlorine-related agents aggravate asthma symptoms specifically in domestic cleaners. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Atopic sensitisation did not seem to play an important role in cleaning-related asthma.

    “Atopic sensitisation did not seem to play an important role in this cleaning-related asthma 18.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [6]6. Reinisch F, Harrison RJ, Cussler S, et al. Physician reports of work-related asthma in California, 1993-1996. Am J Ind Med 2001; 39: 72-83.
  2. [18]18. Roca J, Burgos F, Sunyer J, et al. Reference values for forced spirometry. Eur Respir J 1998; 11: 1354-1362.
  3. [19]19. Roca J, Sanchis J, Agustı ´-Vidal A, et al. Spirometric reference values for a meditterranean population. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir 1986; 22: 217-224.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zock, J. P., Kogevinas, M., Sunyer, J., Jarvis, D., Torén, K., & Antó, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Del Mar (ES)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2002-09
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
679-685
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2125605725
Cited by
93
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Respiratory Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hl062633-03)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (1 R01 HL62633-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Keywords
occupational asthma, cleaning workers, office workers, atopy, atopic sensitization, airway hyperresponsiveness, lung function, chronic bronchitis, respiratory symptoms, smoking, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Asthma, Bronchial Provocation Tests, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Immunoglobulin E, Male, Occupational Diseases, Occupations, Peak Expiratory Flow Rate, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Vital Capacity, Occupational Exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review