The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the natural progression in %FEV1decline in patients with cystic fibrosis: a longitudinal study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Forced expiratory volume in 1 s as a percentage of predicted (%FEV1) is a key outcome in cystic fibrosis (CF) and other lung diseases. As people with CF survive for longer periods, new methods are required to understand the way %FEV1 changes over time. An up to date approach for longitudinal modelling of %FEV1 is presented and applied to a unique CF dataset to demonstrate its utility at the clinical and population level. METHODS AND FINDINGS: The Danish CF register contains 70,448 %FEV1 measures on 479 patients seen monthly between 1969 and 2010. The variability in the data is partitioned into three components (between patient, within patient and measurement error) using the empirical variogram. Then a linear mixed effects model is developed to explore factors influencing %FEV1 in this population. Lung function measures are correlated for over 15 years. A baseline %FEV1 value explains 63% of the variability in %FEV1 at 1 year, 40% at 3 years, and about 30% at 5 years. The model output smooths out the short-term variability in %FEV1 (SD 6.3%), aiding clinical interpretation of changes in %FEV1. At the population level significant effects of birth cohort, pancreatic status and Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection status on %FEV1 are shown over time. CONCLUSIONS: This approach provides a more realistic estimate of the %FEV1 trajectory of people with chronic lung disease by acknowledging the imprecision in individual measurements and the correlation structure of repeated measurements on the same individual over time. This method has applications for clinicians in assessing prognosis and the need for treatment intensification, and for use in clinical trials.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vestbo, J., Hurd, S. S., Agustí, A. G., Jones, P. W., Vogelmeier, C., Anzueto, A., Barnes, P. J., Fabbri, L. M., Martinez, F. J., Nishimura, M., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201204-0596pp · Cited by 15,983
Miller, M. R., Hankinson, J., Brusasco, V., Burgos, F., Casaburi, R., Coates, A., Crapo, R., Enright, P., van der Grinten, C. P. M., Gustafsson, P., et al. (2005) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00034805 · Cited by 15,627
Random-Effects Models for Longitudinal Data
Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529876 · Cited by 8,923
Rabe, K. F., Hurd, S., Anzueto, A., Barnes, P. J., Buist, S. A., Calverley, P., Fukuchi, Y., Jenkins, C., Rodriguez-Roisin, R., van Weel, C., et al. (2007) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200703-456so · Cited by 4,925
Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (2011) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119513469 · Cited by 4,639
Prediction of mortality in patients with cystic fibrosis
Kerem, E., Reisman, J., Corey, M., Canny, G. J., & Levison, H. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199204303261804 · Cited by 993
Cited by
Tosco, A., De Gregorio, F., Esposito, S., De Stefano, D., Sana, I., Ferrari, E., Sepe, A., Salvadori, L., Buonpensiero, P., Di Pasqua, A., et al. (2016) · Cell Death & Differentiation · doi:10.1038/cdd.2016.22 · Cited by 92
Fidika, A., Herle, M., & Goldbeck, L. (2014) · BMC Pulmonary Medicine · doi:10.1186/1471-2466-14-205 · Cited by 46
“Average rates of annual decline in FEV1% are reported to be between one and three per cent [2,3].”
BackgroundDynamic predictive probabilities to monitor rapid cystic fibrosis disease progression
Szczesniak, R. D., Su, W., Brokamp, C., Keogh, R. H., Pestian, J. P., Seid, M., Diggle, P. J., & Clancy, J. P. (2020) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.8443 · Cited by 30
Szczesniak, R. D., Brokamp, C., Su, W., Mcphail, G. L., Pestian, J., & Clancy, J. P. (2019) · IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine · doi:10.1109/jtehm.2018.2878534 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor-Robinson, D., Whitehead, M., Diderichsen, F., Olesen, H. V., Pressler, T., Smyth, R. L., & Diggle, P.
- Venue
- Thorax
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2012-05-03
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 860-866
- ISSN
- 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-3296
- OpenAlex
- W2109577937
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 10.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding the natural progression in %FEV1decline in patients with cystic fibrosis: a longitudinal study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200953
- The paper
- Taylor-Robinson, D., Whitehead, M., Diderichsen, F., Olesen, H. V., Pressler, T., Smyth, R. L., & Diggle, P. (2012). Understanding the natural progression in %FEV1decline in patients with cystic fibrosis: a longitudinal study. Thorax. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200953
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.