Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 575

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lung cancer survival and stage at diagnosis in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK: a population-based study, 2004–2007

Open access
Walters, Sarah, Maringe, Camille, Coleman, Michel P, Peake, Michael D, Butler, John, Young, Nicholas, Bergström, Stefan, Hanna, Louise, Jakobsen, Erik, Kölbeck, Karl, Sundstrøm, Stein, Engholm, Gerda, Gavin, Anna, Gjerstorff, Marianne L, Hatcher, Juanita, Johannesen, Tom Børge, Linklater, Karen M, McGahan, Colleen E, Steward, John, Tracey, Elizabeth, Turner, Donna, Richards, Michael A, Rachet, Bernard, the ICBP Module 1 Working Group·2013·Thorax

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors consider whether differences in stage at diagnosis could explain the variation in lung cancer survival between six developed countries in 2004-2007. METHODS: Routinely collected population-based data were obtained on all adults (15-99 years) diagnosed with lung cancer in 2004-2007 and registered in regional and national cancer registries in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK. Stage data for 57 352 patients were consolidated from various classification systems. Flexible parametric hazard models on the log cumulative scale were used to estimate net survival at 1 year and the excess hazard up to 18 months after diagnosis. RESULTS: Age-standardised 1-year net survival from non-small cell lung cancer ranged from 30% (UK) to 46% (Sweden). Patients in the UK and Denmark had lower survival than elsewhere, partly because of a more adverse stage distribution. However, there were also wide international differences in stage-specific survival. Net survival from TNM stage I non-small cell lung cancer was 16% lower in the UK than in Sweden, and for TNM stage IV disease survival was 10% lower. Similar patterns were found for small cell lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: There are comparability issues when using population-based data but, even given these constraints, this study shows that, while differences in stage at diagnosis explain some of the international variation in overall lung cancer survival, wide disparities in stage-specific survival exist, suggesting that other factors are also important such as differences in treatment. Stage should be included in international cancer survival studies and the comparability of population-based data should be improved.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202297

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 575

Metadata

Authors
Walters, S., Maringe, C., Coleman, M. P., Peake, M. D., Butler, J., Young, N., Bergström, S., Hanna, L., Jakobsen, E., Kölbeck, K., Sundstrøm, S., Engholm, G., Gavin, A., Gjerstorff, M. L., Hatcher, J., Johannesen, T. B., Linklater, K. M., McGahan, C. E., Steward, J., Tracey, E., Turner, D., Richards, M. A., Rachet, B., & the ICBP Module 1 Working Group
Venue
Thorax
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-02-11
Volume
68
Issue
6
Pages
551-564
ISSN
  • 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3296
OpenAlex
W2138705226
Cited by
575
References
2
FWCI
13.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lung cancer survival and stage at diagnosis in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK: a population-based study, 2004–2007. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202297
The paper
Walters, S., Maringe, C., Coleman, M. P., Peake, M. D., Butler, J., Young, N., Bergström, S., Hanna, L., Jakobsen, E., Kölbeck, K., Sundstrøm, S., Engholm, G., Gavin, A., Gjerstorff, M. L., Hatcher, J., Johannesen, T. B., Linklater, K. M., McGahan, C. E., Steward, J., . . . the ICBP Module 1 Working Group. (2013). Lung cancer survival and stage at diagnosis in Australia, Canada, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and the UK: a population-based study, 2004–2007. Thorax. https://doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2012-202297

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.