Cited by 351Health, Environment, Cognitive AgingAir Quality and Health ImpactsAsthma and respiratory diseases

The exposome: a new paradigm to study the impact of environment on health

Open access
Vrijheid, Martine·2014·Thorax

Abstract

Environmental factors, here taken to include pollutants, lifestyle factors and behaviours, can play an important role in serious, chronic pathologies with large societal and economic costs, including respiratory disease. However, measurement of the environmental component in epidemiological studies has traditionally relied on much more uncertain and incomplete assessments than measurement of the genome. The 'exposome' has therefore been proposed as a new paradigm to encompass the totality of human environmental (meaning all non-genetic) exposures from conception onwards, complementing the genome. Evidently, there are large challenges in developing the exposome concept into a workable approach for epidemiological research. These include: (1) the accurate and reliable measurement of many exposures in the external environment, (2) the measurement of a wide range of biological responses in the internal environment, and (3) addressing the dynamic, life course nature of the exposome. New tools and technologies that can be applied to address these challenges include exposure biomarker technologies, geographical mapping and remote sensing technologies, smartphone applications and personal exposure sensors, and high-throughput molecular 'omics' techniques. Prospective, population-based cohort studies have recently started to implement these methods using the exposome framework. The exposome thus offers a new and exciting paradigm for improvement and integration of currently scattered and uncertain data on the environmental component in disease aetiology. This should lead to a better understanding of the role of environmental risk factors in respiratory disease and other chronic pathologies, and ultimately to better primary prevention strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2013-204949

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vrijheid, M.
Affiliations
Barcelona Biomedical Research Park (ES)
Corresponding author
Vrijheid, Martine
Venue
Thorax
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-06-06
Volume
69
Issue
9
Pages
876-878
ISSN
  • 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3296
OpenAlex
W2101274375
Cited by
351
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2
FWCI
6.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Thorax (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
exposome, environmental exposure measurement, biomarkers of exposure, life course exposure, respiratory diseases, environmental risk factors, remote sensing, geographic mapping, mobile application, omics technologies, cohort studies, primary prevention
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Environmental Exposure, Humans, Life Style, Health Behavior, Proteome, Metabolome, Epigenomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review