The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recommendations for the management of cough in adults
Open accessAbstract
### 1.1 Background Patients with cough frequently present to clinicians working in both primary and secondary care.1,2 Acute cough, which often follows an upper respiratory tract infection, may be initially disruptive but is usually self-limiting and rarely needs significant medical intervention. Chronic cough is often the key symptom of many important chronic respiratory diseases but may be the sole presenting feature of a number of extrapulmonary conditions, in particular upper airway and gastrointestinal disease. Even with a clear diagnosis, cough can be difficult to control and, for the patient, can be associated with impaired quality of life.3,4 Sessions dedicated to cough at respiratory meetings are popular, suggesting that the pathophysiology, evaluation, and successful treatment of cough remain topics of keen interest to many medical practitioners. ### 1.2 Need and purpose of BTS recommendations on the management of cough The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS)5,6 have each endorsed their own set of guidelines on the management of cough; however, criticism7 of their content and breadth suggest the need for further concise recommendations. The British Thoracic Society guidelines cover not only chronic cough but also acute cough and the organisational issues of cough clinics. International differences in delivery of respiratory health care and management strategies support the notion that such guidelines would be desirable. The British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee agreed to the development of a Working Group tasked with the job of producing a set of guidelines for the management of cough with the following key objectives:
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vestbo, J., Hurd, S. S., Agustí, A. G., Jones, P. W., Vogelmeier, C., Anzueto, A., Barnes, P. J., Fabbri, L. M., Martinez, F. J., Nishimura, M., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201204-0596pp · Cited by 15,983
Computed tomographic study of the common cold
Gwaltney, J. M., Phillips, C. D., Miller, R. D., & Riker, D. K. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199401063300105 · Cited by 668
on behalf of the Medical Research Council (MRC) Lung Cancer Working Party, Hopwood, P., & Stephens, R. (1995) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1995.124 · Cited by 192
Curley, F. J., Irwin, R. S., Pratter, M. R., Stivers, D. H., Doern, G. V., Vernaglia, P. A., Larkin, A. B., & Baker, S. P. (1988) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/138.2.305 · Cited by 167
The common cold: effects of intranasal fluticasone propionate treatment
Puhakka, T., Mäkelä, M. J., Malmström, K., Uhari, M., Savolainen, J., Terho, E. O., Pulkkinen, M., & Ruuskanen, O. (1998) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0091-6749(98)70301-x · Cited by 89 · cited 1×
“Интраназальные стероиды неэффективны в лечении симптомов обычной простуды, включая кашель [170].”
Cited by
Prevalence, pathogenesis, and causes of chronic cough
Chung, K. F., & Pavord, I. D. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60595-4 · Cited by 665
Dysfunctional breathing: a review of the literature and proposal for classification
Boulding, R., Stacey, R., Niven, R., & Fowler, S. J. (2016) · European Respiratory Review · doi:10.1183/16000617.0088-2015 · Cited by 372
McGarvey, L. P., Birring, S. S., Morice, A. H., Dicpinigaitis, P. V., Pavord, I. D., Schelfhout, J., Nguyen, A. M., Li, Q., Tzontcheva, A., Iskold, B., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02348-5 · Cited by 336
Self-citationProton-Pump Inhibitor Use and the Risk for Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Sarkar, M., Hennessy, S., & Yang, Y.-X. (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-149-6-200809160-00005 · Cited by 301
Muche, H. A., Kassie, F. Y., Biweta, M. A., Gelaw, K. A., & Debele, T. Z. (2021) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-021-04710-4 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Morice, A. H.
- Venue
- Thorax
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2006-09-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- suppl_1
- Pages
- i1-i24
- ISSN
- 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2101745626
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 21.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recommendations for the management of cough in adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/thx.2006.065144
- The paper
- Morice, A. H. (2006). Recommendations for the management of cough in adults. Thorax. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.2006.065144
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.