Cited by 19Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNeuroscience of respiration and sleepRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stable breathing through deeper sleeping

Open access

Abstract

Although there is evidence that patients with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) have anatomical susceptibility coupled with abnormalities in upper airway motor control and/or instability in ventilatory control, the data now suggest that the mechanisms underlying OSA vary considerably between patients.1 In some patients OSA is primarily the result of anatomical problems, while in others it may be due to dysfunctional motor control with only minimal anatomical abnormality. Similarly, abnormal ventilatory control (loop gain) may be important in only a subgroup of patients with OSA.2 As a result, the concept of individualised therapy has now emerged, such that treatment of the major underlying abnormality is likely to be beneficial in the appropriately targeted patient subgroups.3 In theory, patients with OSA who respond well to palatal surgery probably primarily have an abnormality in the velopharyngeal anatomy,4 whereas those who respond well to oxygen may have mainly an abnormality in ventilatory control instability.5 6 The arousal threshold is one concept that has received some—but not sufficient—attention in the OSA arena.7 8 The trigger for arousal from sleep during respiratory events is believed to be increasing negative intrathoracic pressure9 (see figure 1). The realisation of the importance of the arousal threshold in the pathogenesis of OSA has recently been brought to light by the work of Younes, particularly the emphasis that most patients with OSA spontaneously have some periods of stable breathing.10 11 Jordan et al recently observed that these stable breathing periods were associated with markedly increased activity in the genioglossus, …

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/thx.2009.127860

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many patients with a high arousal threshold and sleep apnea experience a lowering of arousal threshold over time on therapy.

    “many patients with a high arousal threshold with sleep apnea will experience a lowering of arousal threshold over time on therapy.”

    From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [418]

    The main text (page not supplied) says that CPAP lowers the arousal threshold in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea, supporting the central point. It does not establish that this happens in many patients or specify that the lowering occurs over time on therapy; its reference to change over time concerns how the elevated threshold may develop. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The arousal threshold is not a fixed trait but changes with treatment.

    “the arousal threshold is not a fixed trait but rather a dynamic phenomenon which changes with treatment.”

    From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [418]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]16. Stanchina M, Malhotra A, Fogel RB, et al. Genioglossus muscle responsiveness to chemical and mechanical loading during NREM sleep. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:945e9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Saboisky, J., Eckert, D., & Malhotra, A.
Affiliations
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Malhotra, A.
Venue
Thorax
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2010-02-01
Volume
65
Issue
2
Pages
95-96
ISSN
0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125514916
Cited by
19
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Thorax (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, arousal threshold, loop gain, genioglossus muscle activity, personalized treatment, palatal surgery, oxygen therapy, negative intrathoracic pressure
MeSH terms
Arousal, Humans, Respiratory Muscles, Sensory Thresholds, Respiratory Mechanics, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review