Ultrasonographic findings in calves with respiratory disease
Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the value of ultrasonography as an imaging technique for the assessment of respiratory diseases in calves. Postmortem findings were used as a 'gold standard'. Eighteen calves aged up to five months which suffered from pneumonia or bronchopneumonia were used. Ultrasonographic and postmortem findings were recorded in eight segments of the lungs of each animal and compared. Ultrasonography of health pulmonary tissue yielded only the pleural reflective band and repetitive artefacts. Pulmonary tissue with bronchopneumonia was detected as a basic echogenic pattern containing hyperechogenic zones. The sensitivity and specificity of the technique for the detection of bronchopneumonia were calculated to be 0.85 and 0.98, respectively.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When compared with ultrasonography, behavioral scores are less sensitive and specific.
“When compared with ultrasonography, these behavioral scores are less sensitive and specific [84].”
From Strategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview (2024) · cites this paper as [84]
Rabeling et al. (1998) found that TUS in calves up to 5 months old presenting with arthritis or chronic lesions at a veterinary clinic had a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 98%.
“Similarly, Rabeling et al. (1998) investigated the use of TUS in calves up to 5 months old, presenting with arthritis or chronic lesions at a veterinary clinic, resulting in a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 98% [84].”
From Strategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview (2024) · cites this paper as [84]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On-Farm Use of Ultrasonography for Bovine Respiratory Disease
Ollivett, T. L., & Buczinski, S. (2016) · Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cvfa.2015.09.001 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Dunn, T. R., Ollivett, T. L., Renaud, D. L., Leslie, K. E., LeBlanc, S. J., Duffield, T. F., & Kelton, D. F. (2018) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13870 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Bovine Respiratory Disease Diagnosis
Buczinski, S., & Pardon, B. (2020) · Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cvfa.2020.03.004 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Strategies for Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Comprehensive Overview
Kamel, M. S., Davidson, J. L., & Verma, M. S. (2024) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani14040627 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
“Similarly, Rabeling et al. (1998) investigated the use of TUS in calves up to 5 months old, presenting with arthritis or chronic lesions at a veterinary clinic, resulting in a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 98% [84].”
BackgroundAdams, E. A., & Buczinski, S. (2016) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2015-10260 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Ultrasonography of the Bovine Respiratory System and Its Practical Application
Babkine, M., & Blond, L. (2009) · Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cvfa.2009.07.001 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Development of a Clinical Scoring System for Bovine Respiratory Disease in Weaned Dairy Calves
Maier, G. U., Rowe, J. D., Lehenbauer, T. W., Karle, B. M., Williams, D. R., Champagne, J. D., & Aly, S. S. (2019) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2018-15474 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Buczinski, S., Fecteau, G., Dubuc, J., & Francoz, D. (2018) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.05.004 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“Thoracic ultrasound findings correlates with necropsy findings (which can be considered as a gold standard) in chronic (Rabeling et al., 1998), subclinical BRD cases (Ollivett et al.”
BackgroundCramer, M. C., Ollivett, T. L., & Stanton, A. L. (2016) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2015-10207 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Mahendran, S. A. (2020) · Veterinary Record Open · doi:10.1136/vetreco-2020-000415 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rabeling, B., Rehage, J., Döpfer, D., & Scholz, H.
- Affiliations
- Federal Institute for Health Protection of Consumers and Veterinary Medicine (DE)
- University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation (DE)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Veterinary Record
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 468-471
- ISSN
- 0042-4900 (ISSN-L)
- 2042-7670
- OpenAlex
- W1995449569
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Veterinary Record (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Ultrasound in Clinical Applications
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
- Keywords
- ultrasonography, calves, respiratory diseases, bronchopneumonia, pneumonia, lung imaging, autopsy findings, sensitivity and specificity
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bronchopneumonia, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Lung, Sensitivity and Specificity, Ultrasonography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review