Generators for Certain Alternating Groups with Applications to Cryptography
Abstract
A set of block ciphers is described which can readily be adapted for computer encipherment of data. The subgroup of permutations generated by any one of these ciphers is shown to be the alternating group, in all cases of interest, suggesting that such systems have a high level of security.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The proof of universality of G1 is a simple reduction to a set of gates shown universal by Kitaev.
“Our proof of universality of G 1 is a simple reduction to a set of gates, which was shown to be universal by Kitaev[39].”
From Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Constant Error Rate (2008) · cites this paper as [39]
Kitaev and Solovay showed that universality of a set G guarantees that any quantum computation can be approximated by a circuit using G with only polylogarithmic cost.
“Kitaev[39] and Solovay[66] showed, by a beautiful proof which uses Lie algebra and Lie groups, that universality of a set G guarantees that any quantum computation can be approximated by a circuit which uses G with only polylogarithmic cost.”
From Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Constant Error Rate (2008) · cites this paper as [39]
The threshold result was independently described by Knill, Laflamme and Zurek, and by Kitaev.
“The threshold result was independently described also by Knill, Laflamme and Zurek[42], and by Kitaev[40, 39].”
From Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Constant Error Rate (2008) · cites this paper as [39]
Theorem 6 (Kitaev, Solovay): For a universal set of gates G over U(m), there exists a polynomial p_m such that any element of U(m) can be approximated up to ε by a word from G not longer than p_m(log(1/ε)), and this word can be found efficiently by a classical Turing machine.
“Theorem 6. Kitaev, Solovay,: Consider a universal set of gates G over U ( m ) , for some integer m . Then there exists a polynomial p m such that any element of U ( m ) can be approximated up to ǫ by a word from G which is not longer than p m ( log (1 /ǫ )) , and this word can be found efficiently (in time which is p m ( log (1 /ǫ )) ) by a classical Turing machine.”
From Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Constant Error Rate (2008) · cites this paper as [39]
Cites
Cryptography and Computer Privacy
Feistel, H. (1973) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0573-15 · Cited by 894 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction
Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A., & Wootters, W. K. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.3824 · Cited by 5,272 · see citing works
Elementary gates for quantum computation
Barenco, A., Bennett, C. H., Cleve, R., DiVincenzo, D. P., Margolus, N., Shor, P., Sleator, T., Smolin, J. A., & Weinfurter, H. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.52.3457 · Cited by 4,311 · see citing works
Time/Space Trade-Offs for Reversible Computation
Bennett, C. H. (1989) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/0218053 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Computing Algebraic Formulas Using a Constant Number of Registers
Ben-Or, M., & Cleve, R. (1992) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/0221006 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
- Authors
- Coppersmith, D., & Grossman, E.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics
- Published
- 1975-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 624-627
- ISSN
- 0036-1399 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-712X
- OpenAlex
- W1971498088
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Coding theory and cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics › Finite Group Theory Research
- Keywords
- alternating groups, block cipher, permutation groups, generators, cryptography, data encryption, group theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review