Cited by 73Cryptographic Implementations and SecurityCoding theory and cryptographyFinite Group Theory Research

Generators for Certain Alternating Groups with Applications to Cryptography

Coppersmith, Don, Grossman, Edna·1975·SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics

Abstract

A set of block ciphers is described which can readily be adapted for computer encipherment of data. The subgroup of permutations generated by any one of these ciphers is shown to be the alternating group, in all cases of interest, suggesting that such systems have a high level of security.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/0129051

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The proof of universality of G1 is a simple reduction to a set of gates shown universal by Kitaev.

    “Our proof of universality of G 1 is a simple reduction to a set of gates, which was shown to be universal by Kitaev[39].”

    From Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Constant Error Rate (2008) · cites this paper as [39]

  • Kitaev and Solovay showed that universality of a set G guarantees that any quantum computation can be approximated by a circuit using G with only polylogarithmic cost.

    “Kitaev[39] and Solovay[66] showed, by a beautiful proof which uses Lie algebra and Lie groups, that universality of a set G guarantees that any quantum computation can be approximated by a circuit which uses G with only polylogarithmic cost.”

    From Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Constant Error Rate (2008) · cites this paper as [39]

  • The threshold result was independently described by Knill, Laflamme and Zurek, and by Kitaev.

    “The threshold result was independently described also by Knill, Laflamme and Zurek[42], and by Kitaev[40, 39].”

    From Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Constant Error Rate (2008) · cites this paper as [39]

  • Theorem 6 (Kitaev, Solovay): For a universal set of gates G over U(m), there exists a polynomial p_m such that any element of U(m) can be approximated up to ε by a word from G not longer than p_m(log(1/ε)), and this word can be found efficiently by a classical Turing machine.

    “Theorem 6. Kitaev, Solovay,: Consider a universal set of gates G over U ( m ) , for some integer m . Then there exists a polynomial p m such that any element of U ( m ) can be approximated up to ǫ by a word from G which is not longer than p m ( log (1 /ǫ )) , and this word can be found efficiently (in time which is p m ( log (1 /ǫ )) ) by a classical Turing machine.”

    From Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Constant Error Rate (2008) · cites this paper as [39]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coppersmith, D., & Grossman, E.
Venue
SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics
Published
1975-12
Volume
29
Issue
4
Pages
624-627
ISSN
  • 0036-1399 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-712X
OpenAlex
W1971498088
Cited by
73
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Coding theory and cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics › Finite Group Theory Research
Keywords
alternating groups, block cipher, permutation groups, generators, cryptography, data encryption, group theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review