The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Scaling and Squaring Method for the Matrix Exponential Revisited
Abstract
The scaling and squaring method is the most widely used method for computing the matrix exponential, not least because it is the method implemented in MATLAB's {\tt expm} function. The method scales the matrix by a power of 2 to reduce the norm to order 1, computes a Padé approximant to the matrix exponential, and then repeatedly squares to undo the effect of the scaling. We give a new backward error analysis of the method (in exact arithmetic) that employs sharp bounds for the truncation errors and leads to an implementation of essentially optimal efficiency. We also give new rounding error analysis that shows the computed Padé approximant of the scaled matrix to be highly accurate. For IEEE double precision arithmetic the best choice of degree of Padé approximant turns out to be 13, rather than the 6 or 8 used by previous authors. Our implementation of the scaling and squaring method always requires at least two fewer matrix multiplications than {\tt expm} when the matrix norm exceeds 1, which can amount to a 37% saving in the number of multiplications, and it is typically more accurate, owing to the fewer required squarings. We also investigate a different scaling and squaring algorithm proposed by Najfeld and Havel that employs a Padé approximation to the function $x \coth(x)$. This method is found to be essentially a variation of the standard one with weaker supporting error analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Horn, R. A., & Johnson, C. R. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840371 · Cited by 9,319
Golub, G. H., & Loan, C. F. V. (1996) · Johns Hopkins University Press eBooks · Cited by 6,027
Varga, R. S. (2000) · Springer Series in Computational Mathematics · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-05156-2 · Cited by 5,811
Benchmarking optimization software with performance profiles
Dolan, E. D., & Moré, J. J. (2002) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/s101070100263 · Cited by 4,412
Accuracy and Stability of Numerical Algorithms: Second Edition
Higham, N. J. (2002) · doi:10.1137/1.9780898718027 · Cited by 3,803
Self-citationDigital control of dynamic systems
Franklin, G. F., Workman, M. L., & Powell, D. (1980) · International Linear Collider · Cited by 3,188
Nineteen Dubious Ways to Compute the Exponential of a Matrix, Twenty-Five Years Later
Moler, C., & Van Loan, C. (2003) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s00361445024180 · Cited by 2,357
Accuracy and stability of numerical algorithms
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-0981 · Cited by 2,072
Nineteen Dubious Ways to Compute the Exponential of a Matrix
Moler, C., & Van Loan, C. (1978) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/1020098 · Cited by 1,526
Cited by
Deformable medical image registration: a survey
Sotiras, A., Davatzikos, C., & Paragios, N. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2013.2265603 · Cited by 1,587
Geometric Means in a Novel Vector Space Structure on Symmetric Positive‐Definite Matrices
Arsigny, V., Fillard, P., Pennec, X., & Ayache, N. (2007) · SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1137/050637996 · Cited by 819
Metadata
- Authors
- Higham, N. J.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1179-1193
- ISSN
- 0895-4798 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7162
- OpenAlex
- W2120516507
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 11.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Scaling and Squaring Method for the Matrix Exponential Revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/04061101x
- The paper
- Higham, N. J. (2005). The Scaling and Squaring Method for the Matrix Exponential Revisited. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications. https://doi.org/10.1137/04061101x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.