The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Payoff-Based Dynamics for Multiplayer Weakly Acyclic Games
Abstract
We consider repeated multiplayer games in which players repeatedly and simultaneously choose strategies from a finite set of available strategies according to some strategy adjustment process. We focus on the specific class of weakly acyclic games, which is particularly relevant for multiagent cooperative control problems. A strategy adjustment process determines how players select their strategies at any stage as a function of the information gathered over previous stages. Of particular interest are “payoff-based” processes in which, at any stage, players know only their own actions and (noise corrupted) payoffs from previous stages. In particular, players do not know the actions taken by other players and do not know the structural form of payoff functions. We introduce three different payoff-based processes for increasingly general scenarios and prove that, after a sufficiently large number of stages, player actions constitute a Nash equilibrium at any stage with arbitrarily high probability. We also show how to modify player utility functions through tolls and incentives in so-called congestion games, a special class of weakly acyclic games, to guarantee that a centralized objective can be realized as a Nash equilibrium. We illustrate the methods with a simulation of distributed routing over a network.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics
Hofbauer, J., & Sigmund, K. (1998) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173179 · Cited by 5,502
(2011) · SpringerReference · doi:10.1007/springerreference_60360 · Cited by 2,855
The Theory of Learning in Games
Drew Fudenberg, B., & Levine, D. K. (1998) · MIT Press Books · Cited by 2,455
Young, H. P. (1993) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/2951778 · Cited by 2,399
Self-citationA class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria
Rosenthal, R. W. (1973) · International Journal of Game Theory · doi:10.1007/bf01737559 · Cited by 2,008
Cooperative Multi-Agent Learning: The State of the Art
Panait, L., & Luke, S. (2005) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-005-2631-2 · Cited by 1,237
Manufacturing systems engineering
Gershwin, S. B. (1993) · Cited by 990
Über ein Paradoxon aus der Verkehrsplanung
Braess, D. (1968) · Unternehmensforschung Operations Research - Recherche Opérationnelle · doi:10.1007/bf01918335 · Cited by 911
Evolutionary Games and Equilibrium Selection
Mezzetti, C., & Samuelson, L. (1998) · Southern Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/1061220 · Cited by 806
Fictitious Play Property for Games with Identical Interests
Monderer, D., & Shapley, L. S. (1996) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1006/jeth.1996.0014 · Cited by 442
Cited by
Revisiting log-linear learning: Asynchrony, completeness and payoff-based implementation
Marden, J. R., & Shamma, J. S. (2012) · Games and Economic Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.geb.2012.03.006 · Cited by 301
Self-citationDesigning Games for Distributed Optimization
Li, N., & Marden, J. R. (2013) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/jstsp.2013.2246511 · Cited by 290
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Marden, J. R., Young, H. P., Arslan, G., & Shamma, J. S.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 373-396
- ISSN
- 0363-0129 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7138
- OpenAlex
- W2176451521
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 29.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Payoff-Based Dynamics for Multiplayer Weakly Acyclic Games. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/070680199
- The paper
- Marden, J. R., Young, H. P., Arslan, G., & Shamma, J. S. (2009). Payoff-Based Dynamics for Multiplayer Weakly Acyclic Games. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization. https://doi.org/10.1137/070680199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.