The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rank-Sparsity Incoherence for Matrix Decomposition
Open accessAbstract
Suppose we are given a matrix that is formed by adding an unknown sparse matrix to an unknown low-rank matrix. Our goal is to decompose the given matrix into its sparse and low-rank components. Such a problem arises in a number of applications in model and system identification and is intractable to solve in general. In this paper we consider a convex optimization formulation to splitting the specified matrix into its components by minimizing a linear combination of the [Formula: see text] norm and the nuclear norm of the components. We develop a notion of rank-sparsity incoherence, expressed as an uncertainty principle between the sparsity pattern of a matrix and its row and column spaces, and we use it to characterize both fundamental identifiability as well as (deterministic) sufficient conditions for exact recovery. Our analysis is geometric in nature with the tangent spaces to the algebraic varieties of sparse and low-rank matrices playing a prominent role. When the sparse and low-rank matrices are drawn from certain natural random ensembles, we show that the sufficient conditions for exact recovery are satisfied with high probability. We conclude with simulation results on synthetic matrix decomposition problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Parikh, N., & Boyd, S. (2014) · Foundations and Trends® in Optimization · doi:10.1561/2400000003 · Cited by 4,102
Latent variable graphical model selection via convex optimization
Chandrasekaran, V., Parrilo, P. A., & Willsky, A. S. (2012) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/11-aos949 · Cited by 377
Self-citationNonconvex Optimization Meets Low-Rank Matrix Factorization: An Overview
Chi, Y., Lu, Y. M., & Chen, Y. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2019.2937282 · Cited by 360
A New View-Invariant Feature for Cross-View Gait Recognition
Kusakunniran, W., Wu, Q., Zhang, J., Ma, Y., & Li, H. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security · doi:10.1109/tifs.2013.2252342 · Cited by 98
Sparsity-Aware Learning and Compressed Sensing: An Overview
Theodoridis, S., Kopsinis, Y., & Slavakis, K. (2014) · Academic Press Library in Signal Processing · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-396502-8.00023-1 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Chandrasekaran, V., Sanghavi, S., Parrilo, P. A., & Willsky, A. S.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Optimization
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 572-596
- ISSN
- 1052-6234 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7189
- OpenAlex
- W2003753589
- Cited by
- 686
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 47.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rank-Sparsity Incoherence for Matrix Decomposition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/090761793
- The paper
- Chandrasekaran, V., Sanghavi, S., Parrilo, P. A., & Willsky, A. S. (2011). Rank-Sparsity Incoherence for Matrix Decomposition. SIAM Journal on Optimization. https://doi.org/10.1137/090761793
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.