Cited by 329Time Series Analysis and ForecastingData Mining Algorithms and ApplicationsImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

A Complexity-Invariant Distance Measure for Time Series

Batista, Gustavo E.A.P.A., Wang, Xiaoyue, Keogh, Eamonn J.·2011·Proceedings of the 2011 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining

Abstract

The ubiquity of time series data across almost all human endeavors has produced a great interest in time series data mining in the last decade. While there is a plethora of classification algorithms that can be applied to time series, all of the current empirical evidence suggests that simple nearest neighbor classification is exceptionally difficult to beat. The choice of distance measure used by the nearest neighbor algorithm depends on the invariances required by the domain. For example, motion capture data typically requires invariance to warping. In this work we make a surprising claim. There is an invariance that the community has missed, complexity invariance. Intuitively, the problem is that in many domains the different classes may have different complexities, and pairs of complex objects, even those which subjectively may seem very similar to the human eye, tend to be further apart under current distance measures than pairs of simple objects. This fact introduces errors in nearest neighbor classification, where complex objects are incorrectly assigned to a simpler class. We introduce the first complexity-invariant distance measure for time series, and show that it generally produces significant improvements in classification accuracy. We further show that this improvement does not compromise efficiency, since we can lower bound the measure and use a modification of triangular inequality, thus making use of most existing indexing and data mining algorithms. We evaluate our ideas with the largest and most comprehensive set of time series classification experiments ever attempted, and show that complexity-invariant distance measures can produce improvements in accuracy in the vast majority of cases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1137/1.9781611972818.60

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Batista, G. E. A. P. A., Wang, X., & Keogh, E. J.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2011 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining
Published
2011-04-28
Pages
699-710
OpenAlex
W2400311702
Cited by
329
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 16
FWCI
21.51
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
time series classification, nearest neighbor classification, time series distance measures, lower bounds, triangle inequality, time series indexing, motion capture data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review