Cited by 5Diabetes Management and ResearchMachine Learning in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Chronobiologically-informed features from CGM data provide unique information for XGBoost prediction of longer-term glycemic dysregulation in 8,000 individuals with type-2 diabetes

Open access
Burks, Jamison H., Joe, Leslie, Kanjaria, Karina, Monsivais, Carlos, O'laughlin, Kate, Smarr, Benjamin L.·2025·PLOS Digital Health

Abstract

Type 2 Diabetes causes dysregulation of blood glucose, which leads to long-term, multi-tissue damage. Continuous glucose monitoring devices are commercially available and used to track glucose at high temporal resolution so that individuals can make informed decisions about their metabolic health. Algorithms processing these continuous data have also been developed that can predict glycemic excursion in the near future. These data might also support prediction of glycemic stability over longer time horizons. In this work, we leverage longitudinal Dexcom continuous glucose monitoring data to test the hypothesis that additional information about glycemic stability comes from chronobiologically-informed features. We develop a computationally efficient multi-timescale complexity index, and find that inclusion of time-of-day complexity features increases the performance of an out-of-the-box XGBoost model in predicting the change in glucose across days. These findings support the use of chronobiologically-inspired and explainable features to improve glucose prediction algorithms with relatively long time-horizons.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000815

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiscale analyses and features of entropy elucidate more information related to the complexity of a data stream than statistics alone.

    “Multiscale analyses and features of entropy elucidate more information related to the complexity of a data stream than statistics alone40–42.”

    From Sleep and temperature data from wearable devices support noninvasive detection of diabetes mellitus in a large-scale, retrospective analysis (2026) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Results section on model performance reports that multiscale complexity and across-day variance features added information beyond statistical features in CGM data. The Discussion describes sample entropy as a measure of signal complexity, but the paper used a different complexity index; it does not establish the claim for entropy features or data streams generally. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burks, J. H., Joe, L., Kanjaria, K., Monsivais, C., O'laughlin, K., & Smarr, B. L.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Smarr, Benjamin L.
Venue
PLOS Digital Health
Published
2025-04-09
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
e0000815
ISSN
2767-3170 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4409313475
Cited by
5
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLOS Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, continuous glucose monitoring, glycemic stability, glycemic dysregulation, chronobiology, glucose prediction, XGBoost, Dexcom

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review