The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Opinion Dynamics in Heterogeneous Networks: Convergence Conjectures and Theorems
Open accessAbstract
Recently, significant attention has been dedicated to the models of opinion dynamics in which opinions are described by real numbers and agents update their opinions synchronously by averaging their neighbors' opinions. The neighbors of each agent can be defined as either (1) those agents whose opinions are in its “confidence range” or (2) those agents whose “influence range” contain the agent's opinion. The former definition is employed in Hegselmann and Krause's bounded confidence model, and the latter is novel here. As the confidence and influence ranges are distinct for each agent, the heterogeneous state-dependent interconnection topology leads to a poorly-understood complex dynamic behavior. In both models, we classify the agents via their interconnection topology and, accordingly, compute the equilibria of the system. Then, we define a positive invariant set centered at each equilibrium opinion vector. We show that if a trajectory enters one such set, then it converges to a steady state with constant interconnection topology. This result gives us a novel sufficient condition for both models to establish convergence and is consistent with our conjecture that all trajectories of the bounded confidence and influence models eventually converge to a steady state under fixed topology. Furthermore, we study the trajectories of systems with fixed interconnection topology and prove the existence of a leader group for each group of agents that determines the follower's rate and direction of convergence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules
Jadbabaie, A., Lin, J., & Morse, A. S. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2003.812781 · Cited by 8,339
Mason, W. A., Conrey, F. R., & Smith, E. R. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868307301032 · Cited by 335
Cited by
A tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part I
Proskurnikov, A. V., & Tempo, R. (2017) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.03.002 · Cited by 553
Opinion Dynamics and the Evolution of Social Power in Influence Networks
Jia, P., MirTabatabaei, A., Friedkin, N. E., & Bullo, F. (2015) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/130913250 · Cited by 318
Self-citationA tutorial on modeling and analysis of dynamic social networks. Part II
Proskurnikov, A. V., & Tempo, R. (2018) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.03.005 · Cited by 294
Opinion Dynamics: Models, Extensions and External Effects
Sîrbu, A., Loreto, V., Servedio, V. D. P., & Tria, F. (2017) · Understanding Complex Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25658-0_17 · Cited by 186
Metadata
- Authors
- Mirtabatabaei, A., & Bullo, F.
- Venue
- SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2763-2785
- ISSN
- 0363-0129 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-7138
- OpenAlex
- W2088760612
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Opinion Dynamics in Heterogeneous Networks: Convergence Conjectures and Theorems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1137/11082751x
- The paper
- Mirtabatabaei, A., & Bullo, F. (2012). Opinion Dynamics in Heterogeneous Networks: Convergence Conjectures and Theorems. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization. https://doi.org/10.1137/11082751x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.