Cited by 335Opinion Dynamics and Social InfluenceComplex Network Analysis TechniquesSocial Power and Status Dynamics

Situating social influence processes: Dynamic, multidirectional flows of influence within social networks

Mason, Winter A., Conrey, Frederica R., Smith, Eliot R.·2007·Personality and Social Psychology Review

Abstract

Social psychologists have studied the psychological processes involved in persuasion, conformity, and other forms of social influence, but they have rarely modeled the ways influence processes play out when multiple sources and multiple targets of influence interact over time. However, workers in other fields from sociology and economics to cognitive science and physics have recognized the importance of social influence and have developed models of influence flow in populations and groups—generally without relying on detailed social psychological findings. This article reviews models of social influence from a number of fields, categorizing them using four conceptual dimensions to delineate the universe of possible models. The goal is to encourage interdisciplinary collaborations to build models that incorporate the detailed, microlevel understanding of influence processes derived from focused laboratory studies but contextualized in ways that recognize how multidirectional, dynamic influences are situated in people's social networks and relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1088868307301032

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The findings of local rules of opinion adaptation have not yet been used to study the collective dynamics of the system, and it remains unclear how social influence plays out in larger scale social contexts over time.

    “However, the findings of local rules of opinion adaptation have not yet been used to study the collective dynamics of the system, and it remains unclear how social influence plays out in larger scale social contexts over time [31].”
  • Social influence can have a substantial impact on the statistical wisdom of crowd effect in societies.

    “As social influence among human group members may trigger individuals to revise their estimates (10), it can have a substantial impact on the statistical wisdom of crowd effect in societies.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mason, W. A., Conrey, F. R., & Smith, E. R.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Review
Published
2007-08
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
279-300
ISSN
  • 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7957
OpenAlex
W2147167010
Cited by
335
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 21
FWCI
8.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
social influence, social networks, persuasion, conformity, interpersonal relationships
MeSH terms
Attitude, Humans, Leadership, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Social Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review