Cited by 51Muscle metabolism and nutritionBiochemical effects in animalsAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Guanidinoacetic acid versus creatine for improved brain and muscle creatine levels: a superiority pilot trial in healthy men

Ostojic, Sergej M., Ostojic, Jelena, Drid, Patrik, Vranes, Milan·2016·Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism

Abstract

In this randomized, double-blind, crossover trial, we evaluated whether 4-week supplementation with guanidinoacetic acid (GAA) is superior to creatine in facilitating creatine levels in healthy men (n = 5). GAA (3.0 g/day) resulted in a more powerful rise (up to 16.2%) in tissue creatine levels in vastus medialis muscle, middle-cerebellar peduncle, and paracentral grey matter, as compared with creatine (P < 0.05). These results indicate that GAA as a preferred alternative to creatine for improved bioenergetics in energy-demanding tissues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1139/apnm-2016-0178

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ostojic, S. M., Ostojic, J., Drid, P., & Vranes, M.
Affiliations
  • Applied Bioenergetics Lab, Biomedical Sciences Department, Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Novi Sad, Lovcenska 16, Novi Sad 21000, Serbia.
  • Klinički centar Vojvodine (RS)
  • University of Novi Sad (RS)
  • Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Venue
Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism
Published
2016-09
Volume
41
Issue
9
Pages
1005-1007
ISSN
  • 1715-5312 (ISSN-L)
  • 1715-5320
OpenAlex
W2422502681
Cited by
51
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Physiology Nutrition and Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biochemical effects in animals
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
guanidinoacetic acid, creatine supplementation, muscle creatine, vastus medialis, middle cerebellar peduncle, bioenergetics, energy metabolism
MeSH terms
Adult, Creatine, Double-Blind Method, Follow-Up Studies, Frontal Lobe, Glycine, Homocysteine, Humans, Male, Neurons, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Pilot Projects, Biomarkers, Up-Regulation, Cross-Over Studies, Dietary Supplements, Hyperhomocysteinemia, Quadriceps Muscle, Serbia, Young Adult, Performance-Enhancing Substances, Middle Cerebellar Peduncle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review